Social Question

mazingerz88's avatar

As a citizen who is concerned about the state of politics in your country, what gives you hope?

Asked by mazingerz88 (29220points) 2 months ago from iPhone

In my case who had been concerned with the brand of politics introduced by Trump voters to America since 2016, I get a sense of hope from the writings of Americans like history professor, Prof. Richardson and I sure do get loads of hope from jellies here in Fluther who through substantial and spirited discussions gave me not just valuable info and insights but also a feeling that as long as Americans are continually engaging and discussing issues…there’s hope that peace amongst Americans will endure.

Here below is Prof. Richardson’s recent letter.

===========

September 14, 2024 (Saturday)

Five years ago, on September 15, 2019, after about a six-week hiatus during the summer, I wrote a Facebook post that started:

“Many thanks to all of you who have reached out to see if I’m okay. I am, indeed (aside from having been on the losing end of an encounter with a yellow jacket this afternoon!). I’ve been moving, setting up house, and finishing the new book. Am back and ready to write, but now everything seems like such a dumpster fire it’s very hard to know where to start. So how about a general overview of how things at the White House look to me, today….”

I wrote a review of Trump’s apparent mental decline amidst his faltering presidency, stonewalling of investigations of potential criminal activity by him or his associates, stacking of the courts, and attempting to use the power of the government to help his 2020 reelection.

Then I noted that the chair of the House Intelligence Committee, Representative Adam Schiff (D-CA), had written a letter to the acting director of national intelligence, Joseph Maguire, on Friday, September 13, telling Maguire he knew that a whistleblower had filed a complaint with the inspector general of the intelligence community, who had deemed the complaint “credible” and “urgent.” This meant that the complaint was supposed to be sent on to the House Intelligence Committee. But, rather than sending it to the House as the law required, Maguire had withheld it. Schiff’s letter told Maguire that he’d better hand it over. Schiff speculated that Maguire was covering up evidence of crimes by the president or his closest advisors.

And I added: “None of this would fly in America if the Senate, controlled by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, were not aiding and abetting him.”

“This is the story of a dictator on the rise,” I wrote, “taking control of formerly independent branches of government, and using the power of his office to amass power.”

Readers swamped me with questions. So I wrote another post answering them and trying to explain the news, which began breaking at a breathtaking pace.

And so these Letters from an American were born.

In the five years since then, the details of the Ukraine scandal—the secret behind the whistleblower complaint in Schiff’s letter—revealed that then-president Trump was running his own private foreign policy to strong-arm Ukraine into helping his reelection campaign. That effort brought to light more of the story of Russian support for Trump’s 2016 campaign, which until Russia’s February 2022 invasion of Ukraine seemed to be in exchange for lifting sanctions the Obama administration imposed against Russia after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014.

The February 2022 invasion brought renewed attention to the Mariupol Plan, confirmed by Trump’s 2016 campaign advisor Paul Manafort, that Russia expected a Trump administration to permit Russian president Vladimir Putin to take over eastern Ukraine.

The Ukraine scandal of 2019 led to Trump’s first impeachment trial for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress, then his acquittal on those charges and his subsequent purge of career government officials, whom he replaced with Trump loyalists.

Then, on February 7, just two days after Senate Republicans acquitted him, Trump picked up the phone and called veteran journalist Bob Woodward to tell him there was a deadly new virus spreading around the world. It was airborne, he explained, and was five times “more deadly than even your strenuous flus.” “This is deadly stuff,” he said. He would not share that information with other Americans, though, continuing to play down the virus in hopes of protecting the economy.

More than a million of us did not live through the ensuing pandemic.

We have, though, lived through the attempts of the former president to rig the 2020 election, the determination of American voters to make their voices heard, the Black Lives Matter protests after the murder of George Floyd, the election of Democrat Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, and the subsequent refusal of Trump and his loyalists to accept Biden’s win.

And we have lived through the unthinkable: an attack on the U.S. Capitol by a mob determined to overrule the results of an election and install their own candidate in the White House. For the first time in our history, the peaceful transfer of power was broken. Republican senators saved Trump again in his second impeachment trial, and rather than disappearing after the inauguration of President Biden, Trump doubled down on the Big Lie that he had been the true winner of the 2020 presidential election.

We have seen the attempts of Biden and the Democratic-controlled Congress to move America past this dark moment by making coronavirus vaccines widely available and passing landmark legislation to rebuild the economy. The American Rescue Plan, the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, the CHIPS and Science Act, and the Inflation Reduction Act spurred the economy to become the strongest in the world, proving that the tested policy of investing in ordinary Americans worked far better than post-1980 neoliberalism ever did. After Republicans took control of the House in 2023, we saw them paralyze Congress with infighting that led them, for the first time in history, to throw out their own speaker, Kevin McCarthy (R-CA).

We have watched as the Supreme Court, stacked by Trump with religious extremists, has worked to undermine the proven system in place before 1981. It took away the doctrine that required courts to defer to government agencies’ reasonable regulations and opened the way for big business to challenge those regulations before right-wing judges. It ended affirmative action in colleges and universities, and it overturned the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision recognizing the constitutional right to abortion.

And then we watched the Supreme Court hand down the stunning decision of July 1, 2024, that overturned the fundamental principle of the United States of America that no one is above the law. In Donald J. Trump v. U.S., the Supreme Court ruled that a president could not be prosecuted for crimes committed as part of his official duties.

We saw the reactionary authoritarianism of the former president’s supporters grow stronger. In Republican-dominated states across the country, legislatures passed laws to suppress Democratic voting and to put the counting of votes into partisan hands. Trump solidified control over the Republican Party and tightened his ties to far-right authoritarians and white supremacists. Republicans nominated him to be their presidential candidate in 2024 to advance policies outlined in Project 2025 that would concentrate power in the president and impose religious nationalism on the country. Trump chose as his running mate religious extremist Ohio senator J.D. Vance, putting in line for the presidency a man whose entire career in elected office consisted of the eighteen months he had served in the Senate.

In that first letter five years ago, I wrote: “So what do those of us who love American democracy do? Make noise. Take up oxygen…. Defend what is great about this nation: its people, and their willingness to innovate, work, and protect each other. Making America great has never been about hatred or destruction or the aggregation of wealth at the very top; it has always been about building good lives for everyone on the principle of self-determination. While we have never been perfect, our democracy is a far better option than the autocratic oligarchy Trump is imposing on us.”

And we have made noise, and we have taken up oxygen. All across the country, people have stepped up to defend our democracy from those who are open about their plans to destroy it and install a dictator. Democrats and Republicans as well as people previously unaligned, we have reiterated why democracy matters, and in this election where the issue is not policy differences but the very survival of our democracy, we are working to elect Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris and her running mate, Minnesota governor Tim Walz.

If you are tired from the last five years, you have earned the right to be.

And yet, you are still here, reading.

I write these letters because I love America. I am staunchly committed to the principle of human self-determination for people of all races, genders, abilities, and ethnicities, and I believe that American democracy could be the form of government that comes closest to bringing that principle to reality. And I know that achieving that equality depends on a government shaped by fact-based debate rather than by extremist ideology and false narratives.

And so I write.

But I have come to understand that I am simply the translator for the sentiments shared by millions of people who are finding each other and giving voice to the principles of democracy. Your steadfast interest, curiosity, critical thinking, and especially your kindness—to me and to one another—illustrate that we have not only the power, but also the passion, to reinvent our nation.

To those who read these letters, send tips, proofread, criticize, comment, argue, worry, cheer, award medals (!), and support me and one another: I thank you for bringing me along on this wild, unexpected, exhausting, and exhilarating journey.

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

12 Answers

RedDeerGuy1's avatar

I have hope from the fact that Trump would die of old age. That he would not be dictator for long.

Tropical_Willie's avatar

I will vote !

GOP may have taken minority and other groups off the voter list, but not me !

jca2's avatar

I have hope because the presidential term is 4 years with a maximum of 8 years, so even if someone awful is elected, it’s only for 8 years, maximum. In the case of Trump, it’s four.

MrGrimm888's avatar

The only hope I have, is by not voting.
It gives me great piece of mind, knowing that I have not okayed the way way our country is ran.
I will not “validate,” the “lesser, of two evils,” as is ALWAYS the case.

The OP, is right about a LOT. I agree with most sentiments, concepts, and concerns.

However. My disagreement, lies with the sentiment, that voters have power. In my opinion, continuing to sign off on one, or the other, of these self serving “leaders.”
IF pur government, is to serve it’s people, it can not actually be run by the wealthiest Americans pulling the strings of these puppets.

Trump used to donate to Harris at one point. Isn’t it obvious? The wealthy buddy up, to both parties, and both candidates.
The wealthy, do not care about Americans needs.

The dynamics of the current system, are FAR too top heavy.
Continuing to ride the poor, and middle class into the ground so the wealthy can be wealthier, is NOT sustainable.

Perhaps. Perhaps my hope (sometimes,) is to watch it all fall apart, and see the wealthy suffer the ramifications of their rampant oppression of myself and my countrymen.

“Hope.” Is just a four letter word.
I never think all hope is lost. But. There are unfortunately, some cases in which “hope” cannot exist.
Greed, beats hope, every day of the week.

gondwanalon's avatar

At this point within the political mess we’re in I find hope in the U.S. Congress. Hope that the U.S. Congress will keep whoever is elected in a power check to prevent the President from doing anything too radical (progressive or conservative).

Tropical_Willie's avatar

So if Harris loses, we can blame all the apathetic non-voters. ?

I say YES !

smudges's avatar

People like most of those here on fluther. Others…not so much.

smudges's avatar

@RedDeerGuy1 Then we’d have Vance. I’m not sure which is worse, but trump has more world experience. Vance is just a toddler. I can just imagine him trying to deal with world leaders…not!

smudges's avatar

@jca2 8 years…even 4, is plenty of time to make our current mess much worse.

Strauss's avatar

The fact that increased voter participation is statistically beneficial to Democrats and Liberal causes. I’ll cite the stats if you want, but it’s been a recorded fact for at least the last half century.

What scares me almost as much as another Trump presidency would be a Vance presidency.

raum's avatar

The next generation gives me hope.

MrGrimm888's avatar

I think, regardless of how things play out, Vance is likely the new prototype Republican candidate.
I believe that at least the GOP, believes Vance very much reflects Trump’s supporters.
White, Christian, male, angry, weird, sexually frustrated, bigot, nationalist, habitual liar, misogynist, closet homosexual, neat appearance, eye liner, fierce blue (white power) eyes, and he’s a sniveling little bitch.
Just like his many doppelgangers, that make up Trump’s base…

The next several POTUS candidates from the right, will likely be very similar to Vance. Same with their lower ranks…

He’s very comfortable pushing, and doubling down, on stupid lies, and doesn’t care about who gets potentially harmed by his words.

He’s a great representative for the current right.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.
Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther