Social Question

RedDeerGuy1's avatar

Is a "lost cause" really the only cause to fight for?

Asked by RedDeerGuy1 (25068points) 2 hours ago

One of the founding fathers said that.

Is it still applicable?
Or really bad advice today?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

8 Answers

jca2's avatar

Do you have a link showing it’s from a founding father? I have never heard that attributed to one of those people.

RedDeerGuy1's avatar

@jca2 No sorry. I heard it on PBS as a teenager. The Google attributes the quote to Clarence Darrow. I don’t know who he is.

canidmajor's avatar

It’s a silly, one-dimensional statement. Please find a reference for it if you state it as quote.

RedDeerGuy1's avatar

@canidmajor Thanks. I agree too. I just heard it on PBS when I was a teenager, and was curious. At the time I thought it was Abraham Lincoln. Or a leader from the revolutionary or civil war?

RedDeerGuy1's avatar

@all Thanks for the fact check. I will flag my question, and and re-ask with out referencing the founding fathers.

Update The new question is in general. Thanks all.

seawulf575's avatar

No, a lost cause is not the only reason to fight. A “lost cause” means the cause you had to fight about has no chance of success. But this country was founded because of a cause: the escape of tyranny. It was highly likely that we would lose against Great Britain who was THE powerhouse of the world at the time. But it was a cause worth fighting for even though it came close to being a lost cause.

RocketGuy's avatar

Better to fight for a good cause – better chance of success.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.
Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther