I'm looking for a way to understand whether a text I'm reading has an immersive experience like in "four dimensions".

I’ve read On Basilisk Station, and I quite appreciated the detailed and moving descriptions of the action, especially the final combat situation where Weber details the fates of crew who happen to be where various extreme ship damage occurs.

But I’m still not quite sure what you mean, in a few ways:

1) I think I get what you mean by “meticulous attention to sensory details, vivid descriptions, and emotional depth”, but I’m not sure how that amounts to “engaging readers as if they’re part of the scene. It seems to me the perspective Weber offers is omniscient with attention to details of cause and effect in arbitrary violence, and shifts to relate the personal experience of various people involved. I wouldn’t think to call that “as if [readers a]re part of the scene” – though it conveys the experience of some of the people in the scene. Is that what you mean?

2) I don’t know what you mean by “in four dimensions”. What four dimensions? In contrast to what? What would be fewer dimensions?

I enjoy the parts of Weber’s writing that focus on the details of how a situation unfolds and why, both technically and impersonally, and then also from various personal experiences and mindsets. It’s often very grim and what happens feels to me more random than forced by the author (even though I expect it’s not as random as I’d prefer). I like that it seems like anyone could die or lose body parts at almost any time, but that it also feels like what happened to get there will be explained and usually make enough sense to satisfy even my very skeptical and demanding criticism.

Another element there is that the characters do tend to receive some attention to their emotional experience and background, as well as their ways of thinking, usually before they get subjected to violence.

Not sure if I understand what your goal is here.

Is is this – Text-To-4D Dynamic Scene Generation
Cornell