AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT:
An introduction:
Our local government is similar to yours- we have councils, mayors, etc.
Our states are different from yours as in there are no Governors, here it is a Federation of states not a Commonwealth, and we have a parliamentary system at the state level. We have state Premiers but they have no executive power in their own right, they are the elected leader of their party.
Federal government is elected by the people like in the U.S but voting is compulsory. It is similar to the U.S as in it is a two party system. Our parties are the same as in the U.K, Liberal and Labor. There are also the Nationals and the Greens who can go into coalitions with the two major parties. The Liberals, up until the 07 election, were in power for 11 years. This whole time the leader was John Howard.
We have two houses of parliament at the Federal Level, similar to the U.S, but instead of congress and senate we have House of Representatives and the Senate. The Prime Minister is the leader of the governing party, however, he does not have the same executive power as the President. In fact, the Prime Minister is elected the same as any other member of parliament, and he just happens to be elected by his party is their leader.
Queen Elizabeth II is technically the Queen of Australia. Her representative in Australia is the Governor General, and once again, technically, he is the highest authority in Australia. In 1975 the Governor General actually exercised part of his power and sacked the Prime Minister. This is unlikely to happen again and while we are a constitutional monarchy, it is mainly symbolic now.
And now commentary from a Liberal voter (my dad): Labor, the current government, are more left-wing (and aligned with unions, socialist?), Liberal are more right-wing (conservative?), however in reality in recent times there is very little difference between the two parties, particularly in budget manner.
If you had to compare with the two parties in the U.S, Liberal are more similar to Republicans and promote a more capitalist society, whereas Labor are more like the Democrats, and promote a more socialist society.
The debates between the two parties are very similar to the debates in the U.S, they argue about the economy, social welfare, and they blame each other for all the problems in the country.
All of the above was put together with the help of my parents, who are Liberal voters. Most of my family are liberal swayed, so that is how I am influenced and that will be where my view comes from, but here is what I’ve picked up, in a nutshell:
I didn’t like John Howard much when he was around. But that was because I was an ignorant hippy child and hated politics because I didn’t understand it, and because I just could, as it had nothing to do with me (voting age is 18). All I could see was that Liberal were chopping down old growth forests and I can’t even remember what else (oh yeah, Iraq and his seeming devotion to GWB, bleugh – see bottom of my answer for more info on this). Now that Labor are in power and we’ve got Kevin Rudd, I’m wishing ol’ Johnny was still around.
The problem is the Labour Government and Kevin Rudd are all talk-talk-talk-propose-speculate-create-a-committee-to-look-into-it-talk-some-more and no action.
I reckon the only reason Labor were voted in this time was because Australia were bored with Liberal, had forgotten what happened last time they voted Labor in, and because of the unions. As was said above, Labor are affiliated with workers unions in Australia. They appeal to the ‘little people’, the workers, and because these people aren’t educated enough to know any better they think ‘Oh he’s talking about us, let’s vote for him”. I mean as was also said above, there aren’t any huuuge differences between the parties, and I don’t have a problem with people who know what they’re talking about voting Labor, it’s just it’s not fair to lure those in who don’t know any better and because voting is compulsory this has a great influence.
However, none of the leaders at the moment appeal to me, so if Liberal had stayed on and Johnny had retired (which he almost definitely would have done, he’s pretty much a dinosaur), we would have got Peter Costello, who just makes me gag. Then there’s Brenden Nelson, ew! And I don’t remember the other guys name… I don’t know who else there is for Labor but hopefully if Liberal don’t make it back in next time round someone better will take over for Kevin Rudd. Kevin Rudd is a twerp and boring as all hell. He avoids questions and just craps on with an obviously rehearsed speech about what he wanted to say all the while just bashing Liberal and not actually saying anything of substance.
Here is a great article that I really implore you all to read to get an idea of what’s going on.
Just a little disclaimer: This is from a 16 year old who can’t vote for 2 years and doesn’t always pay a great deal of attention to what is going on in this country. I must say I’ve been far more interested in your election race than anything around here lately, and before that my thoughts were focused on the war in Iraq, which I was completely opposed to until my Dad went because I didn’t understand it. I didn’t understand what the Australians were actually doing over there until he went. That’s why I didn’t like John Howard at the time, but I realise what he was doing now. The Australians were there to work directly with the Iraqis, trying to teach them how to sustain themselves. I don’t believe Kevin Rudd should have withdrawn them just now. All their work might be lost and things will fall into turmoil again. Now that they’ve left, their work is unfinished. The British have moved in to take over their positions I think, but I’m not sure. I just think the troops should dribble out very slowly, as long as they continue to teach and support the Iraqis and then they will be able to help themselves by the time everyones out. Buuut anyway it’s too late now and obviously a lot more people are happy that they’re home so yeah.
Hope this is what you wanted, PnL :P
Enjoy reading… :D