Ok, can someone please enlighten me. Explain what is so sexist about this question? I thought I was as humanistic as the next person, but, aside from the (I believe) unintended over-generalizations, isn’t this question about a pattern that does occur?
What if he had said “Why on average do some women find rough/thug men more sexy, but want a good guy for the long term?
I have to say that, in my experience, the women who are attracted to “bad boys” tend to make that mistake over and over, and often don’t find their “good guy.” I believe this is a fairly common pattern, but certainly not a universal pattern.
There is theory (if not evidence) about this in the evolutionary biology literature. The way they figure it, women want the genes of the bad guy for their kids, because he has many traits that might ensure that genes get passed on, but women then turn to the good guy to help them raise the kids, because that’s really difficult to do alone, and the bad guy isn’t interested.
I don’t know the numbers, but when I was dealing with infertility doctors, they mentioned that the percentage of children who are (unacknowledgedly) not fathered by their mother’s husband is surprisingly high. I don’t know what surprisingly high means, though. There is, apparently, a lot of fooling around going on out there by women that is not generally noted by society. Certainly enough to justify my version of the question, if not oopsic89’s.
Oh damn. Look at that! I didn’t mean to answer the question, just flame the debate. Well, I suppose there’s plenty of room for other theories besides the evolutionary biologists’.
I have a question. How many people here think evolutionary biology is sexist?