Susanc,
I’m hesistant about delving further into this words vs. actions thing, since I consider it a semantical quagmire. You might ask why did I bring it up in the first place, then? Yes, I’m also wondering that. :-)
Since I did bring it up, and you did ask, I’ll try to suss out what I would consider the heart of the “words” vs “actions” issue. Keep in mind, this is purely semantical.
Susanc, you said But I also think there are ways to make words behave like actions.
Yes, words can behave like actions, and yes, opening one’s mouth and manipulating one’s vocal cords could be considered a phyical act.
“Can’t actions carry thoughts embodied in words?”
I’m not really sure what you mean by that, but I would say that words are not actions, but they can symbolize action.
The alternative to verbal persuasion is what? pushing and shoving? I may not be getting the image you want me to get. Tell me more, o linguistic one.
Changing your name is demonstrating your support for the candidate. You support your “side” the same way that a soccer player supports his team. But saying that you are changing your name does not perform an action in quite the same way that a soccer player “acts” when he kicks a the ball into a goal.
My original point in distinguishing words versus actions was to respond to the idea that changing one’s name is pointless. What I was trying to say was that your reasons for wanting to changing your name may be the same goal as that of the soccer player, supporting your team, but that they are just in different categories.
That’s the best explanation I can come up with off the fly, and I’m sure many may disagree with things I’ve said. That’s fine. These are my opinions and other people are welcome to their own opinions.