I’m curious what other people think. If a man finds himself wanting sex with someone who isn’t his spouse, does that mean there is a disturbing psycho/spiritual distance between him and his wife (or husband)?
If he can actually do all the things it requires to committ adultery (in whatever form), should he interpret that as a significant moral failure deserving of shaming at every turn, perhaps even shunning by everyone? Should he interpret it as a sign to his dimwitted, non-introspective self, or perhaps just a lack of self-awareness in not noticing or not allowing himself to notice that his marriage was in deep doo-doo?
Is the man always at fault in the distancing between spouses (I guess in a gay relationship, the man always would be at fault, LOL)?
I’m sure people feel that if there is a distancing between spouses, and it is unrepairable, then the proper thing to do is to get unhitched before having affairs. I think that men have been trained to hide their feelings, and they do such a good job, they even hide their feelings from themselves. Even where their female spouses point out that there is a problem, a significant number of men refuse to go to counsellihg. Men have to handle it on their own, with denial, a stiff upper lip, etc. or else they aren’t being manly. No crying is a kind of mantra for many men.
I think men are screwed, no matter what. There’s shame in not having a perfect relationship. So you have to hide that. There’s shame in an affair, so you have to hide that. There’s shame in divorce (and maybe a loss of a lot of comfort, too), so you have to hide that.
You can’t admit to having had an affair, either. Guess what? Yup. Shame. Shame’s a killer. Take it from a shame-a-holic. It makes you slow, and dull. It’s hard to generate new ideas or be happy if you are deep in shame. Sometimes shame leads to depression, which generates further shame (because mental illness is stigmatized generally, but doubly stigmatized for men).
I wonder if these descriptions ring a bell with anyone.