General Question

queenzboulevard's avatar

Political Question: What Do You Think of This?

Asked by queenzboulevard (2553points) December 18th, 2008

“I refuse to recognize Barack Hussein Obama as President of the United States of America because he is not a natural born citizen and therefore uneligible according to the U.S. Constitution. The U.S. Supreme Court refuses to even discuss the many lawsuits recently filed by Philip J. Berg, Alan Keyes and many others. The media refuses to discuss it. Just watch some of the videos on my page. If you agree that the U.S. Supreme court should hear the facts and make a ruling then Friend Us”
—YouTube User Comment I saw earlier

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

13 Answers

Magnus's avatar

There’s your problem right there. It’s a YouTube comment.

Jeruba's avatar

Naturally a YouTube user has better resources and more reliable information than an entire hungry and desperate Republican Party.

augustlan's avatar

And is clearly smarter than the Supreme Court. Idiotic.

emilyrose's avatar

How is he not a natural born citizen?

hypeserver's avatar

The internet is full of lies. Like that last statement? Don’t believe it.

basp's avatar

He was born in hawaii to a citizen of the united states and has a legitimate birth cert.

Sour grapes from a mc Cain supporter…..

GAMBIT's avatar

I can refuse to accept that Bill Gates started MicroSoft but it aint gonna get me too far in the record books.

dynamicduo's avatar

Pointless dribble. Many republican blogs made a huge huffuff over Obama’s birth certificate that he posted online. They tried to prove it was fake, it wasn’t a “true” birth certificate (it was a certificate of live birth, which in many states and provinces is equivalent), and now they’re trying this angle. It’s pointless and ridiculous.

I mean, John McCain is more likely to not be a legit citizen as he was born in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936, where as Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961. But do you hear this from the republicans or his other supporters? Nope. In fact, from what I’ve heard, challenging them on this issue causes them to jump on you for not supporting “the greatest American hero he was in a prison camp you know he suffered for our country” etc etc.

dalepetrie's avatar

Denial ain’t just a river in Egypt.

I refuse to recognize George W Bush as President as well since he a) cheated in 2000 and b) lost in 2000 but was basically installed.

He still managed to fuck up the country. My denial is worth no more or less than this idiot’s denial (which is based on far fewer facts than my denial btw).

emilyrose's avatar

I’m with dale—but what’s with the short answer? : )

laureth's avatar

The media doesn’t cover most of the thousands of cases rejected by the Supreme Court each year. If the cases against Obama had been accepted and heard by the Court, that would have made news. But why make news out of the Court’s rubbish?

dalepetrie's avatar

emilyrose – sometimes everything I have to say about something just fits in a couple sentences. I tend to reserve my detailed analysis when, you know, there’s actually an issue to discuss, not just the ranting of some fool.

emilyrose's avatar

@ dale- i was just joking. Have never seen one of your short answers till now but I believe they exist!

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.

This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.

Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther