Do you believe the current Presidential candidates are running because they: 1) Have something important they wish to do as President; 2) Just want to be President for the power, because they feel it is their destiny, etc.; or 3) Just happened to end up in this place at this time, or think now is their big chance because of an otherwise weak field?
Asked by
hossman (
3291)
October 1st, 2007
A popular blogger has asked a similar question and described Reagan and FDR as #1, Bill Clinton as #2, and Pres. Bush and Truman as #3. What are your thoughts on past Presidents and the current field?
Observing members:
0
Composing members:
0
5 Answers
Hillary—#2
Obama—#3
Giulianni—#2
McCain—#2
Paul—#1
Don’t really know enough about the others to give an opinion.
Dennis Kucinich: #1
John Edwards: #1
Barack Obama: a mix of #1 and #3
Hillary Clinton: #2 for sure
I don’t know enough about the Repubs to say.
I think some of the so-called underdogs want to get a focused, national stage on which to share their philosophies, like Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul.
I think some want the power and prestige, like most of the usual front-runners (Clinton, McCain, Giuliani, Edwards, etc.)
I like Ron Paul’s message most of all, being a Libertarian.
Do you think being a #1 is a disadvantage in a campaign?
Obama, definitely #3. Any other year and he would get nowhere—his résumé is too short to be taken seriously as a presidential candidate with experience.
Clinton, I would say #1 and/or #2.
McCain, #1. He’s been at this for a very long time.
**May I just add that I personally am incredibly disappointed in the choices this election. I don’t want to vote for any one of them. Perhaps I should move out of country for the next four years :) The fact that our next president will either be Clinton, McCain, or Obama makes me cringe. I never like voting for senators for president… they always have to settle scores.
Answer this question
This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.