AstroChuck raises an interesting point that I hadn’t really considered, so I shall consider it now. Yes, these machines overall reduce the number of staff needed to check out the customers. But I don’t think this is truly a bad thing. These automated checkouts enable the store to do the following two things.
One, they can reduce the number of cashier employees they need. There will always need to be some cashiers on hand, either to troubleshoot the machine, to get smokes, or to help the occasional person who has a fear of self-checkout. By reducing the number of checkout clerks, the store’s overhead costs are reduced, thus they have the option to reduce their prices without influencing the bottom line in order to give them a competitive edge. And competition in all areas is something I desire to see, as it ultimately benefits me, the consumer.
Two, they can reallocate the cashiers to do other jobs, such as customer service, midday stocking, more food prep, etc. All of these things give the store an advantage in terms of reliability and customer care. It also allows these cashiers to better themselves (if they want to) and become trained on areas that are not only checking out someone’s purchases, resulting in an employee who has more skills, thus is more valuable and knowledgeable.
To me, the advancement of self-checkouts is a natural progression in our workforce evolution. It’s similar to the change that occurred in gas stations. Back in ye olde times (70s and 80s), at practically every gas station there was an attendant who washed your windows, pumped your gas, they even took your money and gave you back your change right there at the window. A full service gas station. I remember growing up when the change to self-service was about 80% complete – I still remember comparing gas stations to see which was was self-serve and which one wasn’t (it was the one that was 3 cents per litre cheaper). Nowadays though, full-serve stations are very rare, in fact the one in my hometown recently renovated itself into a maintenance garage. The gas station attendants gradually lost their jobs, but I didn’t see anyone shedding a tear for them. And nowadays we’ve progressed even further, thanks to the pay-at-the-pump method. Of course, this is not without consequences – gas stations make most of their money inside the store, as their profit on candy and coffee is much higher than their profit on gas, and with less people going inside the store, less high margin items are being sold. But they have chosen to embrace technology. While it means customers don’t come into the store, it also means customers are in and out of refueling much quicker, thus making the establishment more effective, and logically, more profitable.