@aidje
hmmm. nope, not really.
First, I have to elaborate on my definition of “liberal”, as opposed to what some have stated in this thread, “liberal” is really derived from “liberty” (not in it’s Latin origin, but that is a different story).
The question, as you have reformulated would really not make sense, as first and foremost MOST American’s subscribe to “liberal” not “libertarian” values, not few.
Liberal is indeed a very ambiguous term, for the question’s sake, I have assumed this definition:
Liberty, the freedom to act or believe without being stopped by unnecessary force, is generally considered in modern time to be a concept of political philosophy and identifies the condition in which an individual has the right to act according to his or her own will.
and
Political liberalism is the belief that individuals are the basis of law and society, and that society and its institutions exist to further the ends of individuals, without showing favor to those of higher social rank. Magna Carta is an example of a political document that asserted the rights of individuals even above the prerogatives of monarchs. Political liberalism stresses the social contract, under which citizens make the laws and agree to abide by those laws. It is based on the belief that individuals know best what is best for them. Political liberalism enfranchises all adult citizens regardless of sex, race, or economic status. Political liberalism emphasizes the rule of law and supports liberal democracy.
To this effect, my logic was that we as a people cherish these values so much that we even have a national monument attesting to how high we hold these values.
Aside from Mt. Rushmore the statue is THE symbol of the US to the rest of world.
My question, dumbed down a little more even, was something to the effect, how can you use “you liberals” in a demeaning/insulting manner, when so many of our core values are based on “liberty/liberalism”. We even have a monument named so as to proudly display our “liberal” values.
Of course it’s all a question of the “vantage point”.