Good price for a used 3rd party Nikon lens?
I’ve got a Craigslister offering up a slightly used Sigma 105mm Macro lens (retails for $390 + tax online) for $350. It’s been used for under 4 months and is said to be in great condition. Any camera folks want to weigh in on whether this is a good deal, or if a used lens should come in a little lower than that.
Observing members:
0
Composing members:
0
7 Answers
I’m not a Sigma fan to start, you’re better off spending a bit more for a Tokina or Tamron in my opinion.
Is there any substantial type of warranty associated with this purchase? Are you guaranteed to get your money back if it’s a piece of junk? Is it a local seller so you could go try it out before purchase?
I’d be very careful buying anything that did not carry any protection for the buyer.
Do you ebay,great place for lens, lot of good quality retailers with used equipment and waranties, plus pay with paypal most times and you have 100% money back if not as advertised.
Good reviews, about $400 anywhere, for a lens this new $350 is a good price.
I agree with @pekenoe, besides buying first-party lenses, I’ve had better luck with Tamron lenses than Sigma, and if the savings is only $40, go ahead a buy a new one that has a warranty or used as long as you have protection just in case.
Not a Sigma fan at all. Your lens is everything, so you might as well get the best you can for your money. Zeiss, Nikon are top choices.
Answer this question
This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.