Despite everything is Michael Jackson stilll the "King of Pop"?
It’s been nearly 10 years since he released an album. The last decent album was Thriller and that was 25 years ago. His private life is a train wreck. His face is walking adverisment for the avoidance of plastic surgery. And yet despite all this people are going crazy to get tickets for his latest concerts.
Observing members:
0
Composing members:
0
17 Answers
He is amazing, and I don’t believe the negative shit, I think he’s a little misunderstood (A LOT) and he just wants to look like a female anime character? idk He’s ok in my book. A few surgeries and some accusations can’t take away like 30 years of awesome (:
yea because “The Thriller” never dies!
Well, I’ve seen him live. He does put on a good show.
But, he’s still a Creepy McPervyson.
Yea all of that baby over the balcony and come here little boy kinda put out his flame.
I wouldn’t say that the last decent album was Thriller. If you meant the last good MJ album then I’d still disagree. Bad was pretty decent, IYAM.
^Agreed. I liked some of his stuff well into the 90s. But no mas.
But would you pay £15,000 for four tickets on Ebay that have a face value of £75?
He was the “King of Pop” in his day…25 years ago. The music scene has changed alot, and his personal has nothing to do with his music. Speaking of his personal life, what the hell Michael? Wonderland?? Recreated Disney characters? Letting little kids spend the night with you?! I mean, come on man. I liked him and his music, now I just like the music.
Hell to the no. That sicko perv is a has-been. He once was deservedly the King of Pop, but no more. He can’t put out a decent album, he can’t put on a decent show.
There is no reigning king of pop. Michael broke the crown.
I hear rumor that Justin Timberlake is taking up the King of Pop throne. Though honestly I don’t know about that.
However, I think MJ is still the king of pop. At the end of the day, despite whatever he’s become, he still created some of the coolest music around and it’s still being listened to by people of all ages. He may be a bit misunderstood, or totally nuts (who knows?), but I think some of his music is pretty timeless.
I say yes, he’s still the King of Pop. If not, then someone else must have come along to replace him, which has not occurred.
he’s still a hero to me, but maybe not the king, but that’s because mainstream music is the cancer of good music so hey, it’s good he got out.
He is no longer the ‘King of Pop’ – to me, he is simply ‘The King’
Answer this question 
This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.
Composing members:
0
