@Simone_De_Beauvoir – I think those rules it lists and and assumptions it makes about womens’ behavior (as opposed to mens’ behavior) are overtly sexist and stereotypical, describing attitudes about women’s behavior that existed back in the 1950s, and not at all accurate about the differences between mens’ and women’s behavior and mannerisms today, at least in western society. I’m surprised that anyone, especially you, aren’t laughing out loud at the assumptions that all women demur to men in social situations.
Of course, rape is a serious issue, whether or not western civilization condones a “thriving rape culture.” The article lists two approaches to dealing with rape: dealing with the victim, and dealing with the rapist.
The victim, unfortunately, has two options: learn to defend herself, or not. If you have other options to toss out for discussion, let’s hear them…
The rapist, again, comes down to having an effective justice system that puts evildoers behind bars (after facing a fair trial) for as long as it takes to protect society from their behavior. Education is another approach—everybody must be taught the basic difference between right and wrong at an early age. As a semi-Libertarian, I believe an objective definition of right and wrong is the right of every individual to do anything that is non-coercive, or of any group to do anything that is mutually consensual. I believe if we had a largely Libertarian society with such an ethic that respected everyone’s right to live and interact however they choose to that’s mutually consensual, that would go a long way in preventing all sorts of criminal behavior.
But again, to answer your specific question as stated, I beleive that it is the rapists as individuals whom we should hold accountable, and no one else. Rape is a heinous crime, second only to murder, and rapists should face life without parole (real rapists—not that 18-year old with the 17-yo girlfriend) for the protection of society.