@daloon have you got any evidence to show that the population level is unsustainable?
Using the methodology laid out in Jared Diamond’s Collapse, sustainable works out to be 30 million, globally. I’m not that pessimistic.
Most methodologies (using everything from energy to biodiversity to water) put sustainable between 1–2 billion, globally. Here is one such analysis.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16050245
Your notion of keeping medicine from people who reproduce at high rates
Why the hell not? They are the ones exasperating the population problem, it’s only fitting they should be the ones who pay the price
It’ll level off somewhere between eight and nine billion
That’s a very conservative(optimistic) projection, I’ve seen a few models that put peak between 11–12 Billion.
No one can predict the future
No one person can with 100% accuracy, but tens of thousands of people looking at the current data and extrapolating can get damn close.
If we don’t rethink what we are doing and make drastic changes quickly, the ecosystem will collapse within 100 years, taking civilization with it. In all likelihood homo sapien will survive, it’s numbers drastically reduced however, and the survivors and their children will be living in another dark age.
OR We can make hard choices, take control of our own destiny, and the species continues on stronger than ever.
If we decide one kind of person is not worth allowing to survive, that may be just the kind of person we need in the future
:D :D :D
It more like business investing than Russian roulette.
We choose to save Google over the mom and pop grocery stores in backwater USA.
While it may be true that past performances is no guarantee of future results, it’s a really safe bet with Goggle. I’m positive they can come up with something that will benefit 100s of millions of people.