First of all, the person whom I consider to be both the funniest and one of the smartest people (as it relates to human nature) to ever walk the planet, George Carlin, said, “selling isn’t illegal…fucking isn’t illegal…why should selling fucking be illegal.” And I have to agree. Now, we have some very clear arguments against this which have either been espoused or pointed out:
1) Morality – there are many arguments against the morals of having sex for money, but what they all boil down to is one’s personal morality. Why is our society OK with pornography for example…people are getting paid to have sex. Generally, if you take a moral stance against prostitution, by necessity (if you don’t want to be a hypocrite), you must also take a stance against pornography. Furthermore, many times sex is used as non cash currency….how many women have given a guy some form of sexual gratification primarily to get something…it’s prostitution just the same. It’s really a matter of whether or not what you’re giving up is worth what you’re getting in return, and basically, even if it’s a sin and you’re going to Hell, well, that’s your choice. If you truly believe that, then don’t do it, but I am not personally affected when a guy in my town picks up a hooker, I have no part in it, and I disagree with anyone telling them they can’t because it’s against their morals…because though it may be against YOUR morals, who’s to say it’s against THEIRS? Whose call should that be.
2) It cheapens lovemaking…well technically fucking and making love aren’t the same thing…by the same token it can be argued that fucking cheapens lovemaking, so are we going to outlaw fucking? This again is a personal decision….if you have meaningless sex with someone, does it mean that the next time you make love to someone, that act is less valuable…if so, then don’t have meaningless sex. But this is not the case for everyone. Even if it does cheapen future sexual encounters for the participants, that’s again their decision that they have to live with, not you, not your damn business. And again, how is two people you don’t know having meaningless sex cheapening your future lovemaking? No rational argument can be made to satisfy that point.
3) Economic inequality. People have brought up that the prostitute may not exactly be willing to have sex, but money introduces an element of power and therefore its an exploitation. Um, so I take it none of you who made this argument has ever had a JOB? That’s what a JOB is…doing things that you probably wouldn’t choose to do if your time was your own in exchange for money. Who has the power in your relationship with your boss…you, or your boss? It’s a choice….yes, it’s a choice some might not choose to make if they had a better alternative….strippers, garbagemen, and the guy who pumps out septic tanks probably would all choose a different way to make money if they could find one that paid as well.
4) The “law enforcement” reasons. It spreads disease. It happens among a certain element of people prone to other criminal activity. It leads to human trafficking. All valid, problem is, these are symptoms of prostitution being illegal. Let’s tackle these one by one.
Disease – well, first enough, it’s a shame our public education system can’t convince people that unprotected sex with someone they don’t know isn’t a good idea, and there are certainly things our government could, in my opinion, do to solve that problem so that consumers were informed. But many who choose to have unprotected sex with a sex worker are knowingly and willingly taking their lives into their own hands…such is the thrill of having unprotected sex, so much more do they enjoy the act, that they are willing to assume the risks. We can not make some things illegal because some subset of humanity can not control itself. This is essentially the same argument against drugs such as marijuana which are far less harmful than alcohol and smoking combined (yet far less legal). We need to give people the info and let them make their own choices, and they then must bear the responsibility for the consequences of their actions. Bottom line is you can’t legislate a vice…if someone wants to do it, they will do it. But there is living breathing evidence in this country and many others that if you make prostitution legal, and regulate it, so that mandatory weekly tests are done and prostitutes NEVER work “without a net”, you cut down on that. Yes, there will always be people who are able to find strangers to have sex with who won’t insist on protection, no matter what you do, and whether prostitution is legal or not, there will be those willing to pay to take those risks…fuck em, let em all die and clean out the gene pool. As long as those of us who do have regard for our health and well being don’t start screwing around without protection, it doesn’t affect us.
Now, that it promotes or co-exists with other criminal activity. For one drugs, and drug trafficking. Well again, prohibiting certain recreational drugs vs legalizing and regulating them is an outmoded idea which costs billions in lost tax revenue, and causes our prisons to become overcrowded, and the economically disadvantaged to turn to criminal exploits to selling drugs, because their verboten status, much like prostitution, makes them a black market good which can fetch a large amount of money with very low overhead for one willing to assume the risks. Prostitution often makes a mint for pimps who do coerce vulnerable women into prostitution through emotional blackmail and then take all the money for themselves. Many sell drugs as well, and run with gangs who steal, murder, rape, do all sorts of things that are not good for society. But we have a situation where making things like drugs and prostitution illegal can give any morally corrupt person an ample supply of black market futures on which to make a mint. This leads to gangs and violence to control turf, and the original problem (that two people might be cheapining the sex act by putting a $ sign on it), is now causing teenagers to get shot in drive bys or be sold into prostitution. In short, I don’t think making it illegal makes less prostitution, it makes more, so ironically the people who have the biggest problem with prostitution would actually have a world closer to their ideal if they’d give up on criminalizing it.
Now the main thing though is human trafficking, and that as I alluded to is the big problem for law enforcement, and for me as well. The main reason I’d never go to a hooker (at least not one I’d found on the street or on Craig’s List), even if I were single, horny and had plenty of money is this…so many of these women are young girls who were lured away from their families, or picked up on the street after having run away…they meet a smooth talking man who convinces them he loves them and has their best interests at heart, and he essentially brainwashes them into thinking that they’re the “daddy” now, and they are doing the right thing by having sex with several men a day and giving most of that money over to “daddy” who takes care of her expenses. That or at times women are even recruited from overseas to come to a job in the US, and when they get there and think they’re going to be washing dishes as part of some cooperative exchange program, they get sold into sex slavery and will be murdered if they say anything. And the quickest way to stop this? Legalize it, put up brothels like they have in rural Nevada all over this country…no man would have to be more than 20 minutes from a paid sex opportunity. And no woman working in there would be working in unsafe conditions (she’d be having sex right on the property with security so a man couldn’t beat her up or kill her and no one would be the wiser), she’d be tested for diseases every week and would never work without a condom, she would be able to refuse any client for any reason, she’d be able to set a price that she felt was fair, and she’d earn a better living than most women. The tax revenues on this could wipe out our national debt and would more than pay for any of the social symptoms that might arise…i.e. a woman gets too old or has another reason to want to get out of he business, some of those tax revenues could help her get training and/or education to get a different career.
If we did this, you’d have some men choosing to cheat on their wives who wouldn’t have ever had the opportunity if there hadn’t been whorehouses, but you know, it’s up to each of us to decide whether or not to be faithful to our spouses, that’s not the government’s job. You’d still have guys who chose to find streetwalkers because they wouldn’t want to have to wear a rubber, but the demand for prostitution would pretty much be limited to this type of client, and therefore it wouldn’t be quite so lucrative for pimps, and most of these women would actually have the choice, and wouldn’t be coerced into it, and law enforcement would have a lot more time to look for people who traffic if they didn’t have to do stings to pick up every hooker and john, and then pay to house them in jail overnight.
Bottom line, it’s a bunch of puritanical bullshit, just like a lot of things in this country. There are myriad ways to justify the status quo, and the fact that it IS the status quo is what makes it so hard to change…..people are at their core afraid of change, particularly social change of the kind that will completely redefine how you have to look at something. It’s much like gay marriage….really to me, that’s a human rights issue, you should be able to sign a contract to share survivorship, ownership and parenting rights with whomever you want, it’s in fact a more humane system that would allow this than one which would take a person who has built a life with someone for decades and have them shut out on their life partner’s death. But people don’t see gays as married couples, so they have to redefine it in their minds, and that takes time. But they use these arguments about how it’s going to lead to x, y and z and how it cheapens the institution of marriage and yada yada yada, but really, most things people think it’s going to lead to are imagined/hysterical and the consequences are far outweighed by the benefits, and as for cheapening marriage, that’s the same as saying, well, if two people who don’t know each other fuck, then my lovemaking isn’t as important. It’s a bullshit smokescreen for people to hide behind because the concept is too different from what most of us are used to for us to imagine existing in a world like that, and therefore, we much justify our irrational fears with things that at least sound plausible.