My quick response, not even having skimmed all these replies, is that, if you are willing to pay hundreds of dollars, why not go with something more likely to keep its value over time?
These will not as they are knock-offs and not outstanding at that, either.
In that price range, there are several timeless values available out there.
I would start with looking at Design Within Reach.
Other than that, aesthetically, no, I don’t like these pieces. That is personal of course but I have looked at a lot of pieces over the last few decades. I can describe some of the reasons why I have that reaction. First, I don’t care for pieces that have been colored. By colored, I mean stained. Adolf Loos contended that ornamentation = style = obsolete in a shorter period of time. I consider the disguising of the natural grains of wood as this type of ornamentation. Secondly, my feeling is that the shapes, the forms aren’t very innovative and are, in fact, caught in a very 90s aesthetic. They look derived of interesting designs but are not executed as such.
Utilitarian wise, I would not be able to vouch for these w/o seeing them in person but they do look sort of cheap, like factory knock-offs, in which case, I tend to be very suspicious when it comes to quality of construction.
There is a lot to be said for seeing pieces in person and seeing a lot of them. Without the intent of the pieces, I can’t say much more. If you are just buying these for your apartment and you like them and are ok with the price and they suit your needs, get them. Or, take your time. Consider making an investment in something lasting, particularly in this economy.