How much energy do birds expend while flying? Is there a comparable human exercise?
Asked by
andrew (
16562)
July 12th, 2009
I, as many people do, fantasize about the ability to fly. Then I remember that for most creatures it’s a fairly strenuous activity. Does your average sparrow expend as much energy as, say, an olympic level athlete? Or is more like taking a long jog?
Observing members:
0
Composing members:
0
17 Answers
I would imagine the energy exerted was proportional to the flapping of their wings. It probably takes a significant amount of energy to take flight but once they are airborne at a good cruising level and gliding, it’s probably easier to maintain.
The geese flying overhead in formation is probably like jogging while the pigeon constantly taking off and landing is probably like windpsrints.
This is all conjecture as I am not an ornithologist.
Ok, for purposes of discussion, I’m not talking about gliding. I’m talking about flap flap flap get your body in the air. Also, for purposes of discussion, let’s leave those darn cute little hummingbirds out as well.
I’d lean more towards the olympic athlete level because wild animals are in better shape than humans for the most part as it is a necessity to survival.
And, Andrew, you have missed out on the best part of being a bird. The expression “he eats like a bird” is very inaccurate.
“Hummingbirds eat about every ten minutes, slurping down twice their body weight in nectar every day. Most birds eat one quarter to one half their body weight in food daily.” Source
Can you imagine? A 150 lb guy could them pig out on 37½ to 75 pounds of food a day!!!!!!
@andrew- What do you have against those darn cute little hummingbirds?
I’d say it’s even more strenuous than an Olympic level athlete. As Marina pointed out, birds must eat an enormous amount of food in order to expend all that energy. I don’t think Michael Phelps eats half his weight in food every day, high or not!
The average cost for migration days is 130 kJ, of which 71.3 kJ is spent on flight alone; the remaining 24 days are stopovers where an average of 88 kJ d-1 is expended, assuming an ambient temperature similar to that in central Illinois.
from: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v423/n6941/full/423704a.html
The article says elsewhere the average body weight per bird is 30g, so let’s convert to kg and divide:
71.3 kJ expended flying per day / 0.003kg = 23,767 kj/kg expended per flying day
On a flying day, they fly for about 265km, so let’s convert again:
23,767 kj/kg / 265 km = 90 kj/kg/km
This article estimates that running at speeds up to 22km/hr uses about 1 kcal/kg/km, so let’s convert our flying number to kcal:
90 kilojoules = 21.5105163 kilocalories (says google)
So our birds are using about 22kcal per kg to fly each kilometer, and a person uses roughly 1kcal per kg to run a kilometer.
<bows before niki’s giant brain>
Aw, shucks! Don’t make me blush. :)
<starts a new religion to worship niki’s giant brain.>
@nikipedia That’s great! Exactly what I was looking for!
Now… are there any human physical activites (even for 5 minutes) that would compare?
Would flying be the same, as, say… making pancakes? For 5 minutes?
What about lifting the equivalent of one’s body weight?
I was looking of niki’s calculations and it seems that it may be off by a factor of 10. She says that the average body weight per bird is 30 grams which equates to 0.03kg not 0.003 as was stated.
Given that, birds would burn about 2,376.667 kj/kg per day instead of 23,766.667. Assuming that birds do fly 265km per day, they would burn 8.969kj, or 2.144Kcal.
Essentially, divide by 10 and you’ll get your answer. Please correct me if I’ve done something wrong.
Because of the square/cube law, you can’t do a direct comparison. Trying to scale humans down to bird size, or birds up to human size, would produce nonsensical results because of non-scaling constants like the tensile strength of bone and the difference in efficiency between fast-twitch and slow-twitch muscles.
Answer this question
This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.