Social Question

marinelife's avatar

Is there someone you would like to see as President who is not likely to be elected?

Asked by marinelife (62485points) August 6th, 2009

I am so impressed with Al Gore. He has tremendous leadership ability. He has been through the wringer and come out the other side still doing impressive, meaningful work. I would love to see a man of that caliber leading our country.

I also think Olympia Snow might make a wonderful President.

Do you have a candidate?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

72 Answers

PerryDolia's avatar

Jon Stewart

DrasticDreamer's avatar

My sister. She’s amazing.

augustlan's avatar

Myself. Or just… someone like me. I’ve always said that anyone truly worthy of the office will never run. (Not trying to say I’m truly worthy.)

cheebdragon's avatar

I 2nd evils cat

Grisaille's avatar

@augustlan I’d vote for ya.

Bluefreedom's avatar

Gregory Peck
Tom Hanks
Morgan Freeman
Jason Robards
Meryl Streep

tiffyandthewall's avatar

the guy from peachcake (Stefan).

peyton_farquhar's avatar

Optimus Prime.

SquirrelEStuff's avatar

Ron Paul

People still dont realize that he has been warning us for years about the things going on in this country.

NaturalMineralWater's avatar

Major Winters from Band of Brothers.

theichibun's avatar

Stephen Colbert. After all, he does have experience as the South Carolina Governor. Hell, his 40 seconds of being governor produced better results than the 8 years of Mark Sanford will.

buster's avatar

I want Jello Biafra. in office.

wenn's avatar

Stephen Colbert

augustlan's avatar

I second @whatthefluther Dale would do a great job.

RealEyesRealizeRealLies's avatar

Ron Paul got my vote. By now, if he were president, drugs would be legal, the troops would be home, the war would be over, chord blood stem cell research would have proper funding, income tax would be no more and the federal reserve would be abolished.

We’d also return to the gold standard to back the US dollar and lending institutions would be held accountable.

Go to his website please and sign his initiative to hold banks accountable. Can’t give a link because I’m on the googa phone.

tinyfaery's avatar

Gavin Newsom. Or maybe one day…

augustlan's avatar

@RealEyesRealizeRealLies One man alone could not have gotten all that in place. He’d need the support of congress for all of it.

The_Compassionate_Heretic's avatar

@tinyfaery Gavin eh? He’s campaigning for governor currently.

kenmc's avatar

Ralph Nader (end of corporate personhood, restoration of rights)

RP (for the reasons stated by @RealEyesRealizeRealLies)

My left testicle (end of the WoD’s and restoration of rights)

AstroChuck's avatar

Ben or Andrew.

Judi's avatar

Dalepetrie

RealEyesRealizeRealLies's avatar

@augustlan

It wouldn’t be one man alone. It would be one man representing the will of the majority vote.

I believe his doctor background would have made short work of the current healthcare reform. And I certainly don’t see him going back on a campaign promise of not raising taxes to pay for it. He said all along that taxes might have to increase.

Zendo's avatar

No movie stars ever ever again.

AstroChuck's avatar

Actually, I’d like to see Dennis Kucinich: as president. Peter Camejo would be nice as well but i’m afraid we’d need a shovel for that.

drdoombot's avatar

Bill Maher

kenmc's avatar

@drdoombot Eww…. Gross.

augustlan's avatar

@AstroChuck If we can pick dead guys, how about Abraham Lincoln?

AstroChuck's avatar

@augustlan- If we’re picking ex-presidents then I’d rather see Thomas Jefferson or FDR in the oval office.

hungryhungryhortence's avatar

Ralph Nader
Some guy named Dirty B———f

Grisaille's avatar

Besides @augustlan and @cheebdragon, I’d love to see Pootie Tang as Prez.

Sha da tay.

dalepetrie's avatar

Well, I would run, but I’d be prone to saying what I really thought about the first dirtbag to run a negative ad full of lies against me, and let’s face it, politics has no place for the truth. I suspect I wouldn’t make it out of Iowa. But I do appreciate the groundswell of grassroots support.

Palindrome's avatar

Nasir Jones.

Jack79's avatar

Mahatma Ghandi. Oh ok, out of living people? Obama’s pretty good I think, he’s probably as good as it gets as far as presidents go. It would be fun to see someone like Britney Spears or Christiano Ronaldo in that role. For about 5 minutes. Can’t think of any great living politicians.

seVen's avatar

Ron Paul , simply because Dr. Paul is Constitutional patriot/fighter.

benjaminlevi's avatar

Ralph Nader!

jonsblond's avatar

Richard Branson

OpryLeigh's avatar

Barbra Streisand, Cher or Dolly Parton would all get my vote!!!

aprilsimnel's avatar

Daryl Hall ::sigh::

He could sing his statements on policy ever so sweetly to the American people during the State of the Union address and press conferences.

wundayatta's avatar

I don’t think the person who holds the presidency is the problem, for me. I think we’d need a whole lot of unlikely people in Congress in order to really make changes in this country. Particularly on the health care issue. In any case, I’d have all my activist friends elected to Congress, especially in red states.

marinelife's avatar

@dalepetrie would have to take an oath not to talk su to death before I would vote for him, but I usually do like his thinking.

cheebdragon's avatar

Andrew

@marina lol

dalepetrie's avatar

@Marina – don’t worry, I’m a writer, not a talker.

marinelife's avatar

@dp Then you have my vote, sir.

jeanna's avatar

Another vote for Colbert here.

I like Bill Maher, but I don’t think he’d make a great president.

kenmc's avatar

@jeanna Bill Maher is a douche bag..

jeanna's avatar

@boots I respectfully disagree, love.

jonsblond's avatar

@boots I agree. Maher is full of douchebaggedness.

whatthefluther's avatar

@aprilsimnel…and John Oates for V.P.! . Even Congress would gladly accept a Presidential Veto just to hear: “I Can’t Go for That (No Can Do)” ! See ya…..Gary aka wtf

Bri_L's avatar

Well if it couldn’t be @dalepetrie then mmmmm

filmfann's avatar

Todd Palin. I would vote for anyone who could wear a “I Fucked Sarah Palin” t-shirt. Which means I would vote for George Clooney too.

ubersiren's avatar

Anarchy 2012!!!

MacBean's avatar

Betty White.

Bri_L's avatar

@MacBean – LURVE. Betty Fricken White!

SquirrelEStuff's avatar

@to all that said Bill Maher is a douchebag

Why do you think Bill Maher is a douchebag? While I dont agree with everything he says, I believe he has one of the best shows on tv. Im not saying I’d want him to be President, but why do you feel this way?

filmfann's avatar

@chris6137 I didn’t mention Bill Maher, but I agree that he is a douchebag.
His movie on Religion was unfair. Following 9–11, he went on Television and said we had it coming, that we deserved it. He is a comedian who has forgotten that his first duty is to make us laugh.

jonsblond's avatar

@filmfann You are right. He did forget that he was a comedian.

@chris6137 I watched Bill Maher for years. He was one of the few reasons why I had HBO. His fall season in 2008 focused entirely on Sarah Palin and it was very abusive, sexist and not so funny. It became boring hearing him slam her every single Friday. So boring that I could care less about seeing his movie. He turned into a very arrogant man the past few years and he is not the comedian I used to enjoy.

janbb's avatar

Pete Seeger when he was somewhat younger.

dalepetrie's avatar

@filmfann – Unless there’s a quote I DIDN’T hear, I believe his post 9/11 quote didn’t say anything even remotely like “we deserved it.” What he said was that everyone was writing off these suicide bombers as “cowards”, and call them whatever you want, but someone who is willing to slam themselves into a building at several hundred miles an hour for what they believe in is not exactly a “coward”. Your comment just illustrates how people take things out of context. Now, if he DID say something else about why we may have “deserved” it, I’m kind of doubtful he used that language or even implied that. But I can give you an example of an argument which could EASILY be misquoted or misconstrued as “we deserved it”, and it goes like this.

Christmas 1979, Afghanistan was engaged in a civil war, and in the midst of the chaos Russia decided to invade and replace the head of the government the Muslim opposition was trying to push back, and of course being heavily financed and armed, it was pretty much a bloodbath. Russians went after Afghans in what can only be called a genocide, firing after anything that moved with their helicopters. They would also target the Afghan children, knowing that an injured child, say with missing limbs, would require people to tend to them, people who would be able to fight back if they weren’t tending to injured children. Furthermore, Afghanistan was DIRT poor, and they were trying to fight back the 2nd largest superpower on the planet with weaponry which was as much as a century old. It was a positively HORRIBLE atrocity. The UN couldn’t pass a resolution against it however because Russia vetoed it. And what did the US, the most powerful country in the world, a country with a vested interest in everything Russia did at the time, do? They basically ignored it. The US banned the export of grain to Russia, they pulled out of strategic arms limitations talks, and they boycotted the Olympics in Moscow.

So, why didn’t they do more (at first)? Well, because they realized because of how the Afghan landscape was, very rugged and mountainous, essentially Russia had gotten themselves into their own Vietnam, and the US LOVED that. But eventually someone got the right people involved and over the course of the next 7–8 years, US funding went from $5 million to $500 million matched by the Saudi’s, arms were purchased with the involvement of many countries in a very under the table fashion which kept the Russians from knowing our involvement (because we didn’t want the Cold War to become a REAL war) and by I believe 1987 or 1988, the Russians pulled out, effectively dealing them the first defeat of the Russian army ever.

In the meantime, people like Bin Laden were coming to power in the vacuum that was left behind, but all these future leaders of Al Quaeda and the Taliban really had little idea of how instrumental the US was in driving back the Russian aggression, but what they did know about it, they realized that the US justification for doing ANYTHING at all was mostly self interest, any good intentions we had were masked by the way we did things, and when these future Al Quaeda leaders came to power, they saw pretty much a country which originally was dirt poor, but which now was utterly destroyed…schools, hospitals, anything essential they once had was GONE. And the US on whom they were able to count on for half a billion in funding when the Russians were there, couldn’t get a thin dime out of the US. One million dollars in funding to rebuild schools couldn’t even get to the floor of our Congress. It seemed that the US was pretty much concerned with the cold war with Russia, but didn’t give a slim fuck about this poor nation whose people had been ravaged, raped, murdered, dismembered, etc…..we came in, escalated things to the point where the destruction of the nation was almost complete, and then dropped them like a red headed stepchild once we had vanquished OUR enemy.

So, these people came of age and came to power being of the impression (and not a wholly misguided one), that the US’ talk about being a force for good, fighting back against human rights violations in the world, was all a bunch of bullshit. At our hearts, a million dollars out of a budget of hundreds of billions was too much to ask to help out a country which genuinely needed it, yet when it served our purposes, half a billion was not. Our entire society in fact was in the heart of the ME decade, there was a lot of conspicous consumption in our culture, we clearly valued money first, power second, and somewhere way down the list, human rights of non-Americans. From their perspective, it was a fair assessment (hell, from MINE it’s a fair assessment).

So, we became the embodiment of everything that was wrong with the world, as the last remaining superpower, we spent over 10 years following our dropping the ball wielding our power like we owned the fucking world. And these people resent the fuck out of us, and were hell bent on teaching us a lesson.

So, did we “deserve” it? No, no one deserves that. But can I see how they could have thought we deserved it? Sure. Can it be argued that we brought on their wrath? Yes, indeed it can. And I suspect if Maher said ANYTHING besides pointing out that suicide bombing is not a “cowardly” act, I’m willing to bet it was in relation to this situation which the US had a HUGE hand in creating.

jonsblond's avatar

@dalepetrie Maher is still guilty of being arrogant and sexist. Not presidential material if you ask me. Wait a minute. I just described Clinton.

Maher is no Clinton.

dalepetrie's avatar

@jonsblond – I have no quarrel with you there, I’m not defending Maher as a Presidential candidate, but I do want to set the record straight on the whole idea that he’s some sort of anti-American psycho. His arrogance does often rub me the wrong way, like when he was promoting his Religulous movie which, really….is it even NECESSARY to ridicule religion…either you’re a believer or you’re already in on the joke, he kept talking about how he likes Obama, but he thinks Obama is probably a closet atheist…like he can’t wrap his mind around how an intelligent person could also be a person of faith. I agree with him about the reasons to not have faith, but I don’t automatically assume that everyone intelligent is an athiest, perfect example of his arrogance if you ask me. The fact remains however that I’ve heard a number of people accuse him of anti-American sentiment, but I h have yet to see what should surely be easy to obtain evidence thereof if it actually exists.

MacBean's avatar

@Bri_L—I seriously considered writing her in. XD I might have, had circumstances been different.

@chris6137—I still love Bill Maher. Like you, I don’t always agree with him, but… I don’t think there’s anybody that I always agree with. Anyway, my point is, I love the guy. But I still think he’s a douche. Because… well… he is. Asshattery often has more to do with delivery than with content, and a lot of the time he delivers his opinions like a first class jerk.

filmfann's avatar

@dalepetrie You’re correct. He didn’t say we deserved it, exactly. He said we were cowards. From THE BIG STORY.org:
Panelist Dinesh D’Souza mentioned that he didn’t think the terrorists were “cowards,” as George Bush had described them. Maher replied: “We have been the cowards. Lobbing cruise missiles from two thousand miles away. That’s cowardly. Staying in the airplane when it hits the building. Say what you want about it. Not cowardly. You’re right.”

So you are correct, but this guy is still an unfunny jerk.

dalepetrie's avatar

@filmfann – agreed, he definitely comes off as a dick, but he does have his moments…he’s made some pretty good points here and there, but not someone I’d lay down money to see do standup by any means. I guess I generally agree with his political views, not necessarily how he expresses them, and at best he at times says things that I find to be incredibly clever, but rarely laugh out loud funny, and then with just a bit too much condescension in my opinion.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.
Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther