Unstated truth is bad enough. What happens if we state the truth all the time?
First of all, it seems like it is causing gratuitous injury. Is there any positive effect from saying every truth?
I think that humans, for the most part, speak all the truth that is useful to speak. People make calculations as to what other people can hear, and what will put up their defenses, so the truth is counter-productive.
I think radical honesty is about changing the balance for some people. The line between a useful truth and a counter-productive truth is not easy to draw. Some people err more often on the less truth side, and others on the more truth side. People who don’t tell enough of the truth probably would be helped if they could learn how to speak more of the truth. People who speak too much would probably be better off, socially speaking, if they curbed their tongues a bit more.
There are competing goods here—social adhesion vs important information. We all make judgments about how important the information is, and whether it is worth creating social discomfort.
I think we need to tell the truth, because it is hard to be known if you don’t. However, I think that truth can often lead to shame and pain and it can create deeper gulfs between people. I like fluther because I can tell more of the truth here. Part of that is because no one really knows who I am or where I live or who my friends and family are. Less is at stake with people you don’t interact with in your community.
As we get to know each other better, and we build a history, it may become more difficult to speak our minds as fully. I think that’s the case in any relationship. The more you value and depend upon someone’s company, the less likely it is that you will be willing to piss them off, and risk losing the relationship.
And what the hell is truth, anyway? Whose point of view contains the truth? We use differing nomenclature all the time. Yesterday there was a question about the use of “mankind” vs using “humankind.” Which is more true?
Other people would call me a “cheater” but I don’t think of myself that way, because I know that I never stopped loving my wife and I never wanted to leave her. I thought I was filling a need I had in a way that would least bother my wife, since she didn’t seem to be interested in having that kind of relationship with me. Usually I don’t bother with my point of view, since that is inviting attack, I think. I just call myself a cheater, as other people would, and what can they say? Using that word acknowledges the fault that others see. But is it the truth? Can we really know how to assign responsibility? Or blame?
Truth is tricky, and if we can’t be sure of the truth, how can we be honest? We might be honest to our points of view, but is that helpful? Sometimes overt honesty is covert dishonesty. Does inviting attack help you live a better life? Do we have to share absolutely everything?
Radical honesty sounds like a great thing. I have no idea how to carry it out. I don’t think it’s a theory I put much credence to.