I believe in god as the creator and lawmaker of our universe. I believe in Jesus Christ. I believe in humanism. I believe in love and kindness and forgiveness and solidarity. I believe in the importance of enlightenment and the power of scientific method.
Evolution like general relativity or quantum mechanics is a consequence of applying scientific method. Evolution currently provides the best explanations of how species developed on our planet and offers a deep understanding of the phenomena in nature. To religious people evolution can be interpreted as God’s way to continually change living beings. Evolution is creation is progress. What currently is known about evolution cannot alone explain all phenomena in the development of life. This means scientists have to continue their quest for finding even better explanations augmenting the science of evolution.
My explanation for the sad fact that many religious people state they do not believe in evolution has only in part to do with what’s written in holy books. The accelerating change of technology and the massive information overflow related to it creates fear. Many people long to get simple answers. Modern liberal forms of religion have largely failed to appeal to spiritually inclined people. Spiritual voids are being exploited by the religious right with their (hidden) political agenda. It seems that people only have the choice of becoming atheists or joining the religious right and their anti-scientist way of thinking. Where is the third way? Where are the charismatic leaders who can explain that the existence of God and evolution is no contradiction? Where is the resistance of religious people against the mega-televangelists preaching about a vengeful God? What happened to the Christian core values of kindness and mercy?
To me “not believing in evolution” is no small trivial offense, unless people have really been denied access to good education. Not believing in evolution is almost like supporting Galileo Galilei’s house arrest. How come some people have not learned this important historical lesson? If people “not believing in evolution” become a majority in modern western societies we’re in trouble. I really mean it. So far young-earth creationists are a minority, but I’m worried and I’ve pointed this out in some other threads as well.
Some ancient Greeks already knew the Earth was a sphere and were even able to determine the circumference of our planet with remarkable precision. They had great philosophers and scientists. What happened? A steady decline followed. It took Europeans more than 1500 years to rediscover their way of thinking. It’s called the Renaissance and it led to the age of Enlightenment. The witch hunts continued for a while but eventually reason prevailed. This example shows that advanced civilizations such as the ancient Greek have no guarantee of survival.
Here’s another example: the Islamic Golden Age dated from the 7th to 13th centuries. During this period, artists, engineers, scholars, poets, philosophers, geographers and traders in the Islamic world contributed to the arts, agriculture, economics, industry, law, literature, navigation, philosophy, sciences, sociology, and technology, both by preserving and building upon earlier traditions and by adding inventions and innovations of their own (Wikipedia).
What happened? A steady decline followed. No invention or significant discovery in any of the Islamic countries after the year 1500. The dark ages clergymen took over. We can still observe the effects today when fatwas are issued or when people fly planes into skyscrapers awaiting 72 virgins as a reward. What will happen if the dark ages clergymen of Christianity take over? Can we really be so sure reason stays in control? History teaches us other lessons. Nothing is guaranteed. Humanism is not guaranteed. Democracy is not guaranteed. We have to defend it every day. We have to be watchful. If young-earth creationists take over the US will become a theocracy. Separation of state and church will no longer be maintained. The Puritans in the US in the year 1700 believed that there should be no difference between religion and government, that the state and the Church should be governed by the same laws. Some of the religious right feel the same way.
If modern religion does only offer what the religious right has to offer we’re in trouble. Religious people should be offered something else. Michael Lerner calls this the ‘Left Hand of God’. Open-minded religious people capable of critical thinking should join forces with spiritually inclined agnostics and atheists because many values are in fact shared values.