@Grisaille Most Christians would be disgusted? Who knows? I hope you are right. However I think that there are hundreds, if not thousands of different groups with their own spin on the Bible. Most of them are probably disgusted at any number of the others’ interpretations. I don’t see why any interpretation should be privileged over any other, except that they can mass together people to protect their interpretation by force of numbers.
Disgust is fine. I’m totally in favor of having an opinion about someone else’s interpretation. What I don’t like is when disgust crosses the barrier to censoring or righteousness. Anyone who refuses to question their interpretation of the Bible has a problem, I think. In fact, that may be the problem with religion in general—so many people thinking that they, and only they, are right.
@SpatzieLover Those two problems would seem to be contradictory. If people aren’t allowed to edit, that’s censorship. If people are uncensored, they will edit. The Bible is a document that has gone through many different translations and much editing.
Have you ever played that game—telephone? Where you get a group of people together and one person whispers a sentence into the next’s ear, and they each pass the message on down, and the person at the end then speaks the message aloud, and they compare the ending message to the original message?
If you’ve played, you know that the two messages will be very different. You may have seen the same thing in making copies. If you copy a copy, the image gets fuzzier and fuzzier with each subsequent generation. Or try translating a sentence into another language, and then translating it back to the original language. The resemblance between the original and the current version is laughable! To believe that the “word of God” as it stands in current Bibles bears much resemblance to the “word of God” when it was first written down is to place an undue faith the capabilities of human beings.
At this point, I think it is safe to say that the Bible means whatever the group reading it says it means, and that there are thousands of different groups with different senses of what the Bible means. You are Catholic, and the Catholics have one of the more successful (in terms of longevity) organizations in history. Yet even they have difficulty maintaining orthodoxy within the Church. Or perhaps they, especially, have difficulty, due to their size.
New versions of Christianity have splintered off from old ones so many times, I don’t think anyone can count the different kinds of Christianity. And they all have interpretations of scripture that vary from each other to a greater or lesser extent. This conservative effort is nothing new. It will get attention to the extent that it attracts followers. That’s nothing new, either.
This is a tempest in a teapot, as far as I’m concerned. There is nothing new here. Not one bit.