Social Question

Ashleyh429's avatar

Is hooking up good or bad, and how so?

Asked by Ashleyh429 (160points) October 13th, 2009

Some people will argue that hooking up is just exploring sexual territories. Others claim it is immoral and will only lead to problems such as STDs, hurt feelings, and bad habits. How do you feel about this?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

38 Answers

Sarcasm's avatar

-What is or isn’t “immoral” is quite subjective.
-STDs don’t magically appear, you have to have sexual contact with somebody who has them. Make sure you and your partner are checked out.
-Hurt feelings vary from person to person. I never had “hurt feelings” involved with hooking up.
-Bad habits? What does this even mean? If someone has sex, they’ll stop doing their homework? stop brushing their teeth? Will they become murderers?

Simone_De_Beauvoir's avatar

It could lead to any of those things – doesn’t mean it’s ‘bad’

Ashleyh429's avatar

@Sarcasm
More like becoming addicted to sex… (I’m having to do an argument about this for my class this Friday…-just thought I’d get an idea of what’s going through people’s heads)

Ashleyh429's avatar

Weird class, huh? But… it’s my assigned topic, so I’m welcoming anything, from both sides…

deni's avatar

I think it depends too much on each individual person and the circumstances surrounding the hook up and how many feelings are involved and how close the two people were to begin with and if its awkward now and if you were inebriated…

KatawaGrey's avatar

Hooking up is good if you are smart about it and want to do it.

Hooking up is bad if you go about it in a stupid way and if you do not want to do it.

I went through a very short hooking up phase and I had a few rules to keep myself and the people involved from getting hurt and it all worked out pretty well.

1. Only with friends. You trust these people already and neither of you wants to hurt the other.

2.No first times. If a guy hadn’t done something sexual, I certainly wasn’t going to do it with him. That could get messy and emotional real quick.

3. No repeats. Once again, this can lead to emotional messiness and nastiness that can cause all sorts of problems.

4. Talk about it before or after. This ensures that there is as little confusion as possible. This lets the other person know what your intentions are.

5. No intercourse. This also leads to messiness and nasty emotions and could cause complications.

These rules are not for everyone but I would suggest having some sort of “game plan” if you’re going to try hooking up. The stupid ones are the ones who walk into a bar, get smashed and say, “Hey, good looking, can I show you a good time?”

patg7590's avatar

I would say bad. Sex was never created to be taken lightly. It’s purpose to is to fuse two people’s souls together.

imho

MrItty's avatar

“hooking up” is a personal choice between the would-be participants, and no one else’s opinion matters in the least.

Ashleyh429's avatar

One thing I would like to put out there, often, hooking up is not specified… Sometimes, one person is looking for a relationship, then afterwards they end up hurt when they find the other wasn’t looking in the same direction…

ItalianPrincess1217's avatar

As long as both people are in agreement as far as what the outcome will be, hooking up is fine. The problem is when one of the people involved want more than just a one night stand. Then emotions become involved and feelings get hurt.

Sarcasm's avatar

@patg7590 I thought its purpose was to fuse a sperm and an egg. Silly me.

MrItty's avatar

@patg7590 uh…huh… and in your mind, that means there was a point in history in which sex didn’t exist? It was “created”? Please, praytell, how did our ancestors get here before that creation?

Ashleyh429's avatar

@MrItty True, however, in order to make a successful argument for my class, one way or the other… I need to know the opinions of others, so I will know how to sufficiently support my claim.

Simone_De_Beauvoir's avatar

@Sarcasm or a sperm with sperm…or…well you get the picture

galileogirl's avatar

So in newspeak hooking up means casual sex? Then why not say casual sex? There is something a little strange about not being able to say what you mean in plain language like there is shame or embarrassment in the topic. If you call it hooking up maybe you have answered your own question. There must be something wrong with casual sex if you can’t even say the words.

Ashleyh429's avatar

@galileogirl Hooking up is what my professor labeled it, not me… I can use either term, doesn’t really matter since it means the same thing really…

patg7590's avatar

@MrItty
not intended as flamebait
yes I believe humans were created, by a God who cares for us deeply, who has no beginning and no end, and that sex is one of the many gifts that God has given us as a way to have beautiful and fullfuilling relationship with one person whom we choose to be our helper (mutually of course), and so that we can multiply and enter into the creative process alongside our God who started it all.
braces for flaming

Darwin's avatar

Personally, I have always felt sex and the intimacy that goes with it is best reserved for long-term relationships, in order to help create and maintain the bond between two people. Once you start running around having casual sex with a number of people, it is no longer special, so you have to find other ways to create lasting bonds once you find the partner you want to be with for a long time.

Of course, you can’t always know that the casual partner is really as truthful or careful as you think, so you do run an increased risk of STDs, infections that can make it difficult or impossible to have children later, or even things such as HIV.

From my perspective, I think casual sex is a pretty stupid thing to do. And I think calling it “hooking up” makes it sound like what happens when two dogs go at it on the playground.

Why can’t people restrict exploring sexual territories to people that they really care about and who care about them in return?

MrItty's avatar

@galileogirl I’ve heard at least 3 different definitions for “hooking up” from different people. Could be any of the following:
Getting together to hang out for the night
Getting into a relationship
Getting together to fool around sexually, without actually having sex
Getting together specifically to have sex, without being in a relationship
Meeting and having sex randomly, without planning on it beforehand.

MrItty's avatar

@patg7590 I have no intention of flaming you. I was amused by your assertion that sex was created, as the implication (or so I thought) was that sex was created after human beings were created.

But let’s go from your argument. Assume everything you say is true. Human beings aren’t the only one of God’s creations that have sex. Every other animal species on the planet does too. Do they have sex for the purpose of “merging souls”? Do they have souls to merge? Are they “allowed” to have sex for fun? Are they allowed to have sex with multiple partners? Are human beings the only ones to whom this soul-merging restriction applies?

Again, not flame. At this point, I’m honestly curious as to how your argument extends.

galileogirl's avatar

@Ashleyh429 Then your professor must have a problem with discussing casual sex, right?

@MrItty Also doing your job as a tow truck driver and fastening a garment. All the more reason to be specific. What a shame if you were expecting casual sex when agreeing to a hookup only to find your car disappearing into the night.

Simone_De_Beauvoir's avatar

@patg7590 what flaming, my god? it’s not like we haven’t heard all that stuff before…you believe what you believe…and I believe what you don’t believe…

Ashleyh429's avatar

*Let’s not turn this into a religious debate… They can get pretty nasty… =(

patg7590's avatar

@MrItty I’ve often wondered that myself, I would say no, that humans are the only creatures privileged (or cursed depending on your view), to have an additional deeper spiritual/emotional connection component of sex.

I know a few species besides humans have sex for pleasure, Dolphins I believe are one example.

I think the difference might come from the way that each was created, when man is created, it is in the likeness of God that he is, and since there is a spirtual/emotional component of God, and man is being created: ”In God’s image”, that there is that same component (I guess we could call it a soul or spirituality).

Animals on the other hand, are created, seemingly out of God’s imagination, not meant to be representative of God.

Of course this is all just a feeble, off the cuff guess; I’m sure the intricacies in the real answers are far more complex and beautiful than anything I could hope to “explain away” here or anyplace else.

cheers.

patg7590's avatar

@Simone_De_Beauvoir please dont be such a pompous ass to believe that you already know someone’s entire belief system based on one or two posts.

wundayatta's avatar

My tendency is to think it is not so good, as far as mental health is concerned. My understanding of the term is that it means casual, no strings attached sex. It usually happens with people who you know, casually, and are attracted to, and don’t mind hanging out with, but have no interest in going any further than having a little fun one night (or maybe more).

The thing is that hook-ups can often turn into imbalances where one person becomes more attached, as a result of the sex. You see, I don’t think you can truly separate sex from emotions. It is not merely having fun (unless it’s a commercial transaction, although even that can be difficult).

Sex is best when it is coupled with strong emotions. But beware! Emotions can lead to an involuntary facial expression, but it works the other way around, too. Voluntary facial expressions can cause you to feel the feeling associated with that expression. In a similar way, having sex with someone you don’t feel very close to can make you feel much more involved with them than you were before you fucked each other.

I.e, you are fooling yourself if you think you can just hook-up with no emotional consequences. There isn’t really any such thing as casual sex with a friend. It is always more, and you can both try to deny it, but you’re just messing with your own heads, so don’t be surprised if things have a way of getting weird and complicated.

Sex is a way of expressing some of our most important and deep emotions. To try to engage in sex while pretending that there’s nothing more than fun involved is to ask for a cognitive dissonance, which leads to confusion and emotional uncertainty. That can be painful, and so hooking up can cause that pain.

On the other hand, we are social creatures, and moral codes aside, I think humans cement strong ties by having sex with people they want to be close to. I think that because sex outside of primary relationships is considered immoral, this leads to a lot of cognitive dissonance, as people try to reconcile their feelings with what is socially acceptable. In any case, if people want to make love to those they love (but not in a permanent partnership way), they have to do it in secret, with shame.

Hooking up is a term that tries to reclaim some acceptability for the practice. But, at the same time, it sets up rules that are contradictory. You want to get together and share body fluids because you care about a person, yet you have to pretend it really isn’t that deep.

I don’t think hooking up is good or bad, but I do think our attitudes about sex are fucked up, in general. I understand that STDs and primary relationships, and taking care of children, and all kinds of other things (social acceptability and status) are tied up in this complicated mix. I think it leads to a lot of emotional pain—more for some of us than for others. I think hooking up is a way to try to deal with these conflicting social mores and personal and emotional needs, but that it is a dysfunctional way of coping. It is pretending to be something that it is not and can not be, because what it is and should be is socially unacceptable.

[edit] I’d like to see you put that into your argument [said ironically]. If you do, let me know how it goes over, lol!

nikipedia's avatar

Hooking up is hooking up. If it’s bad, stop doing it. If it’s good, party on.

aprilsimnel's avatar

Everyone needs to be clear on what’s happening beforehand, especially since each person’s attachment level vis-à-vis sexual activity is different. Some people can go in and have a good time and leave again and it’s no harm, no foul. Some people get profoundly emotionally attached if someone merely sees them naked.

It’s an emotional and sexual crap shoot. For my own peace of mind, I’ve never initiated sexual activity with a guy I didn’t want in my life for a long period of time. The relationships themselves may not have worked out, but the intention was never to just hit it and quit it.

YMMV, as one of our wise Jellies, likes to say. Figure out what works for you. That means you’ve got to really think and be clear with yourself about what you want.

CMaz's avatar

Everything has a risk. What risks are you willing to take?
And, of those risks you are willing to take what safety measures will you take, to lower the risk that you are willing to take?

JONESGH's avatar

I think hooking up is okay. As long as both people are clear with the circumstances and that nothing more will come out of it.

derekfnord's avatar

Yep, as long as both parties are going into it with eyes open and not trying to use the hookup to manipulate the other person in some way, then I think hookups are fine. There may be other complications (such as if one of the people involved in the hookup is involved with someone else, etc.). But that’s really a separate issue (a violation of trust with that person or whatever). It’s not a problem with the hookup per se.

Iclamae's avatar

As a point of debate, I don’t think hooking up is a bad thing. I think @KatawaGrey put it best with “there’s the smart way and the stupid way.” I also think that if you make it clear beforehand to the partner what your intentions are “just playing, not getting emotionally attached” you’ve covered that base. If the partner then proceeds to develop feelings, you need to stop, as they obviously can’t control themselves.
As for STDs, protection, tests, and knowing who your partner is are very important. As is baby protection.
Definitely CAN’T be the partner’s first time at sex though. They’ll take it to heart and no one ever forgets their first time.

hungryhungryhortence's avatar

Good: gives people an idea of how they’re geared sexually, if they take their best pleasures from relationships, monogamy, casual dating, etc.

Bad: the possible exposure to STD’s, emotional burnout and desensitization to those who push themselves stubbornly to ‘stay in the game’ when they might be better suited to settling down but feel like they might miss out on something if the do.

ckinyc's avatar

If you have to think so much about it then don’t. It is not for you. On the other hand…

Simone_De_Beauvoir's avatar

@patg7590 you assumed that you’d get flamed for what you said – I was simply saying that you wouldn’t…however I will flame you for being someone that insults me…

marionef's avatar

It all depends on what you are looking for. If it is just a casual encounter you need to make sure that your partner is on the same wave length that you are. And definitely take precautions for stds and pregnancy

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.
Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther