Fusion 2 vs Parallels 4: Which is better for running Windows XP on a MacBook Pro?
Asked by
OnaBoat (
362
)
October 21st, 2009
In your experience, which is better for running Windows XP Pro on a MacBook Pro – VMWare Fusion 2 or Parallels 4? Why? How do they compare on features and performance?
Observing members:
0
Composing members:
0
4 Answers
I use VMware myself, I use it to access my physical bootcamp partition without rebooting. It works well and I’ve never had any problems. It even has Unity mode so you can run Windows apps in their own windows right along with Mac apps.
I’ve never used parallels, what is it you’re looking to do with them? They are best for light use, no gaming or anything heavy allowed, since they just emulate a graphics card more or less; VMware at least, I assume Parallels is similar.
I use VMware Fusion 2 on my MacBook Pro (17) and my MacPro desktop to run XP. I have never used Parallels but from what I have read Fusion has a smaller footprint and makes better use of system resources. BTW Fusion 3 is shipping next month.
Neither. Fusion 3 will be more memory efficient than either, and run a bit more smoothly on less than adequate hardware. Definitely worth the wait!
I use VirtualBox. It is free so you can check it out. It works for me.
Answer this question 
This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.
Composing members:
0
