General Question

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

9 Answers

Spargett's avatar

I’ve found that Aperture really did revolutionize my RAW digital workflow. I used to loath coming back from a shoot and digging through and editing all the photos.

I found Lightroom to be a poor rip off of Apple’s Aperture with a paricularly terrible user interface.

Besides, when the time comes for deeper post processing you can just set Photoshop as your default external editor and send a non-destructive version of the image out. As always, Apple set a new bar for revolutionary and progessive concepts and techniques in digital content and management applications. Its certainly feels right at home among Apple’s line of groundbreaking pro apps.

And as I stated, Lightroom feels like a cheap imitation. Still for deep and highly advanced post processing, Photoshop is still the most powerful solution.

Check out the product pages for each app as well.

Spargett's avatar

duplicate post via server error

ezraglenn's avatar

There was a great article comparing them in Macworld over the summer.
You can find it here:
http://www.macworld.com/article/58422/2007/06/digitaldarkroom.html

I use Lightroom, but it’s only because I got a free copy. I would definitely use Aperture if I could get my hands on it.

heyu1021's avatar

I think it’s like comparing adobe cs to adobe elements. I would use lightroom for quick edits and to keep my photos organized. Aperture would prob just be used for more advanced or creative editing.

glial's avatar

I like Lightroom much better. Aperture is very slow in my opinion.

I regret buying Aperture.

Spargett's avatar

Aperture is slow if your computer is slow. People have to remember that it’s a PRO app. That means you’d usually have PRO hardware. That’s why they market iPhoto to general consumers instead of Aperture.

It’d be like buying a Ferrari and complaining that eats alot of gas.

glial's avatar

I have a 17” MacBook Pro 2.33gHz with 2 gigs of ram; it is slow and a MacBook 2.2gHz with 4 gigs of ram; it is slow.

And I am a PRO…thanks…

Spargett's avatar

@glial

Weird, I have a slower computer with less RAM and it runs just fine for me. I also have a pretty hefty library too. When was the last time you did some system maintenance?

P.S. Didn’t know you were a “pro”.

vanguardian's avatar

for the record – aperture 2 just came out. If you recently bought aperture you can upgrade for $9.95, otherwise the new one is $199.99.

You can download trials of each. I recommend you do that. They both have their +\- with functions. Aperture is the better of the two. I’m assuming you already have PS. If you don’t, you really should go that route first.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.

This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.

Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther