Put yourself in the spooky demon-haunted mindset of a Young Earth Creationist and ask yourself, “On what basis would they subscribe to any scientific findings whatsoever?”
Here’s a quote from one such creationist who illustrates the mindset:
“I look at the flat-out mockery that “science” has made of “the science of global warming” and compare it to the similar mockery that “science” made out of “the science of evolution.” And I realize the IDENTICAL crap is going on with global warming that has gone on with Darwinian evolution for decades. It’s not about “science”; it’s about a philosophy or ideology that is IMPOSED onto science which is then itself then called “science.”
“I’m personally very open to a young earth view. I trust what the Bible says far more than I trust what the people who gave Al Gore a Nobel Prize for science say. I don’t see one reason whatsoever anymore to allow “science” to dictate what I believe and what I accept to be true given the terrible history of deception and propaganda that way too many scientists have propagated in its name. They’ve pretty much forfeited all credibility in the “meta” issues.”
And this fellow is a moderate, as these folks go! As the Creationists see it, science seeks to destroy the authority of the Bible and to replace it with “godless” theories so that Science becomes the ultimate go to authority on matters of social policy. Not surprisingly, they see godless science as Satan’s handmaiden. As I have written and documented elsewhere there are well-funded cadres of Christian fundamentalists with a theocratic agenda who have engaged in a stealth campaign to undermine the credibility of science among the general public.
Dick Armey, the former Republican House Majority leader and now astroturf tea party organizer is a lobbyist for polluting industries attacking any effort to transition to a clean energy economy makes an couches his denial of global warming in explicitly creationist terms
“What I’m suggesting is we have a sort of an eco-evangelical hysteria going on and it leads me to almost wonder if we are becoming a nation of environmental hypochondriacs [...] Now these are observations that are popular to make because right now its almost taken as an article of faith that this crisis is real. Let me say I take it as an article of faith if the lord God almighty made the heavens and the Earth, and he made them to his satisfaction and it is quite pretentious of we little weaklings here on earth to think that, that we are going to destroy God’s creation. [...]”
Sen. James Inhofe who is currently on his way to Copenhagen as a one man “truth squad” denying global warming purportedly has a list of 700 “prominent scientists” who object to the statement that the scientific community has reached a consensus about man-made global warming. One of these “scientists” was Chris Allen a Fox-affiliated TV weatherman who holds no college degree, believes in creationism, and belongs to a Southern Baptist church. Inhofe refers to him as a meteorologist and quotes from his “scientific writings”—a blog—about global warming:
“[J]ust because major environmental groups, big media and some politicians are buying this hook, line and sinker doesn’t mean as a TV weatherperson I am supposed to act as a puppy on a leash and follow along,” wrote Allen. “All of this (global warming alarmism) is designed to get your money and then guilt you in to how you live your life.”
What Inhofe doesn’t quote are Allen’s more explicit religious statements:
“My biggest argument against putting the primary blame on humans for climate change is that it completely takes God out of the picture…”
“It must have slipped these people’s minds that God created the heavens and the earth and has control over what’s going on. (Dear Lord Jesus… did I just open a new pandora’s box?) Yeah, I said it. Do you honestly believe God would allow humans to destroy the earth He created? Of course, if you don’t believe in God and creationism then I can see why you would easily buy into the whole global warming fanfare. I think in many ways that’s what this movement is ultimately out to do—rid the mere mention of God in any context.”
“What these environmentalists are actually saying is ‘we know more than God— we’re bigger than God—God is just a fantasy—science is real… He isn’t… listen to US!’ I have a huge problem with that..”
Sarah Palin, by the way, is another creationist and global warming denier.
Why claims of global cooling should not be taken at face value.
Why lists of climate warming denier scientists should not be taken at face value.
There is also the problem of quoting contrary to context. Here is a website that purports to present a list of 650 dissenting scientists at a U.N. climate change conference. They offer a list of excerpts from their report, one of which was:
”Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor receiving any funding, I can speak quite frankly… . As a scientist I remain skeptical.”—Atmospheric Scientist Dr. Joanne Simpson, the first woman in the world to receive a Ph.D. in meteorology and formerly of NASA who has authored more than 190 studies and has been called “among the most preeminent scientists of the last 100 years.”
It was easy enough to look up the report they cited which was a long and nuanced discussion of the problems of having to make global generalizations from local observations and flawed models. What she actually said was:
“Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor receiving any funding, I can speak quite frankly. What should we as a nation do? Decisions have to be made on incomplete information. In this case, we must act on the recommendations of Gore and the IPCC because if we do not reduce emissions of greenhouse gases and the climate models are right, the planet as we know it will in this century become unsustainable. But as a scientist I remain skeptical.”
As a scientist she is right to skeptical of claims based on flawed data sets and imperfect models since the human effect on climate change may be caused as much or more by harmful changes in land use as by CO2 emissions. Current models do not adequately factor in population and land use, particularly in tropical and coastal areas, a defect she hopes will be corrected in a Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission Data Set to be presented in February 2008.
That data has since been presented, and so far as I can tell, it does not disconfirm global warming. In fact, Scientific American ran an article in October 2008 that explored the possibility that we may have already passed the tipping point for global warming.