There’s certainly nothing wrong with loving animals, but I have a serious problem with anyone who truly believes that animals are worth more than humans. Given a choice between a human life and the life of any animal, I choose the human. Those who suggest that animals are somehow superior are guilty of anthropomorphizing animals, and it is the characteristics imprinted on those animals by humans that are superior, not the natural behavior of the animals. Take the obvious example of dogs. Dogs exist within a fairly simple social hierarchy, and when the top animal in their pack is a human who enforces behavior that is morally acceptable to humans, you can get a dog whose behavior is better than many humans. But if you look at dogs left to their own devices, their hierarchy is established and enforced through violence, they will tear outsiders to shreds for intruding in their territory, they spend their live hunting and killing any animal they can find to eat, and if the animal is smaller, young, old, or otherwise weaker so much the better. I cannot say whether or not they will kill for fun, but they will kill for social position and favors, bringing their prey to an animal above them in the hierarchy, which may or may not actually want to eat it. Dogs, like all animals, are amoral. They make no ethical or moral judgments, only judgments that will get them fed or keep them from being attacked. And as for cats, anyone who has watched a cat with a mouse or a bug knows that cats torture and kill any small enough animal just to amuse themselves. No argument can be made that such and animal is better than humans. If you look into other animals you will find regular and stunning acts of barbarity within their natural lives, even supposedly gentle animals like dolphins.
No animals, left to their own devices, would ever come up with the idea of vegetarianism, or band together to risk their lives to fight fires that threaten animals they don’t even know, they would not concern themselves with the well being of animals on the other side of the planet. Only humans are even capable of considering morals and ethics, and while some reject moral decisions, as a whole humanity is capable of great acts of selflessness and kindness. Even if most days they seem selfish and self centered, only humans are actually capable, on the whole, of taking actions that benefit others with no perceived benefit to themselves.
That to me is why, funny as the old “the more I like my dog” joke is, and even if some people are complete jerks, I will never actually like animals more than people, and why there are people who consider it a flaw to like animals more than people. If the animal is a pet, then it is not the animal who is responsible for its behavior, it is the owner. If the animal is wild, you just haven’t seen enough of the overall behavior of the species in an objective manner to realize that it’s not nearly as nice as it seems.