@laureth
I suppose I will in time read the Wikipedia article about it .
While I appreciate the sobriety you bring into my question, I don’t quite aggree with your assessment.
Indeed, there are those who question the very existence of this entity beyond a loosely knit group—far from the “bunkers in Afghanistan” myth Rumsfeld was attempting to feed us.
911, in my view, was one big sucker punch. It wasn’t the first time a big plane hit a sky scraper in NYC. . Here’s Howard Roark defending his blowing up some other buildings in NYC .
:-D
I believe that the US, particularly the Bushites, promote the idea of the (very) dangerous Al-Qaeda as it justifies a number of their actions and that only a very powerful enemy could have inflicted so much harm. Al-Qaeda also has an interest in this: as it makes them look Baaaaaaaadass.
The reality is, their actions have diminished—not so much because of the War on Terrorism, but rather people are employing modest, but solid, increses in security, and otherwise wising up.
Most of the carnage in Iraq and Afghanistan, or for that matter Chechna, is indigenous.
At first Osama said nothing, as if 911 was the mysterious Islamic Heavenly Wind, the Kamikaze, the Will of Allah.
Then Osama started talking.
Then he started to attach conditions.
“Come on you evil Americans. Get out of the Mid-East. Huh? Can ya. Please? It’s a matter of honour. I have friends. They look up to me. Please. Pleeeaaasseess???”
I consider humour to be a good weapon too.
Btw, here’s a cute conspiracist video: 9/11 Lessons From Star Trek
:-D