I want to point out that I’m not talking at all about pitch here, because for the most part I think pitch has little if no correlation (never mind a causal relationship) to sexuality. The lisp, on the other hand, while obviously not causal, seems to correlate pretty consistently with gay dudez at least insofar as my own experience, etc.
Also: prepare to read what is surely nonsense.
Anyway, I’m gay and my voice is somewhat deep and raspy. There’s a very, very slight lisp that only emerges when I’m speaking real lazily, and as often as I’m aware of it I attempt to suppress it. If I let it slip out I’m embarrassed; I hate it.
The reason is that to me the stereotypically homosexual male voice is actually pretty unattractive, so I try to do what I find attractive and speak the way I think a typical straight guy probably would. If that makes any sense.
Also I’m always trying to engineer others’ conception(s) of me, and since I’m not exactly out of the proverbial closet it’s become a no-brainer that the less gay I sound, the less likely my friends and family are to suspect I’m gay.
As to why the lisp develops apparently more frequently in gay men: I wish I knew. To some extent I feel it’s become sort of biologically mimetic (as opposed to genetic, obv). But in any event, to me it is the biggest indicator of homosexuality in closeted people, i.e. it usually produces the clearest/loudest blips on my ‘gaydar’ or whatever. (I’m not talking about a plain old lisp, here. There’s a noticeable difference between a regular lisp and a gay lisp.)
Now, I hate to make generalizations because I’m probably wrong, but I think most straight guys would feel pretty insecure if they had the exaggerated and flamboyant and lisping voice that’s attributed to openly gay men. So when I run into guys who both claim to be straight and speak like Richard Simmons, I confess I begin to get a little suspicious and curious. In their cases, they’re definitely not making concerted efforts to effect the gay lisp, and yet there it is. So if it’s mimetic there, then it’s un/subconsciously so. Like @holden said, I guess, except he said it way more clearly….
The real interesting thing to me is that apparently they don’t realize how like Richard Simmons they sound. I mean a lot of people seem to be unaware of what they sound like in reality/to others, and if they ever manage to hear themselves they’re kind of surprised and say ‘Do I really sound like that?’ and ‘I don’t like hearing my own voice’ and ‘I sound like a fag,’ and so on, because for the most part they can’t control their voices and those voices either a) betray a truth they’d rather not confront (e.g., they’re gay) or b) do not at all accurately represent who they feel they are. You know, internally and whatnot.
Sometimes I also feel like my voice doesn’t belong to me. We’ve all felt like that. So I guess I can imagine that there also exist some genuinely straight guys out there who struggle with lisps or otherwise gaytypical voices because those voices happen to be deceiving or misleading or totally not representative of the genuinely straight dudes they’re coming from.
So I obviously have not a fucking clue, but what was probably meant with all the above is that I think the correlation is attributable to biosocial mimicry but that it certainly isn’t causal and certainly doesn’t prove or disprove a thing re: sexuality, and that a lot of times our voices aren’t very good indicators of who we are but we nonetheless try to effect certain styles of speech that conform to social expectations or whatever, and it can kind of be like the clothes we wear. When my mom is around black people she adapts the way she speaks. When she’s around me she adapts. Around my father. Likewise I think if I were to finally begin hanging out with a bunch of flaming gayz I’d probably begin to sound more like they sound, too. Yeah.
If you read any of that I apologize but I will also blame Pepsi Throwback.