What is the difference between a red herring and a Non Sequitur?
Asked by
freckles (
363)
February 9th, 2010
I am studying logical fallacies and I can’t figure out what is different between these two.
Observing members:
0
Composing members:
0
6 Answers
A red herring is something that looks like it’s significant/important but is misleading. Mystery novels almost always have a few red herrings so they can surprise you in the end. A non sequitir, as the translated name suggests, is something that doesn’t follow – it’s out of the blue, out of sequence
A red herring results in a wild goose chase.
A non sequitir is an amusing, unrelated story you hear while on a stake-out.
A red herrring throws the reader off the track. A non sequitur throws the writer off the track.
Non sequitur is latin for “it does not follow.” It’s in latin because it is a rhetorical device, and rhetorical devices were exhaustively studied in the Classical and Renaissance worlds. To “not follow” is to be completely unrelated to the flow or logical path of a discussion or argument.
A “red herring” is a misleading piece of information. In the 1800’s, british prisoners used to rub herrings on their escape paths to divert the attention of pursuing dogs. In the 1920’s, the U.S. investment community began using the term “red herring” to describe investment reports that were not complete, and therefore potentially misleading. The current meaning evolved over time to include any clue or piece of information that might trick someone into following the wrong line of thinking.
@Jeruba I loved that answer! Short, to the point, and spot on. I like sardines.
How about in a debate? “That is a red herring”, or “That is a non sequiter” to someone’s assertion.
Answer this question
This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.