@JLeslie – Why insulting to religion? Because religions evolve. I’m a liberal Christian and if some young-earth creationist nutcase is telling me that Eve was literally made from one of Adam’s ribs when God performed open chest surgery using a medical saw blade I feel insulted. My religion is not some kind of Harry Potter hocus pocus. Besides, Eve came first. Adam came later.
I don’t agree that ancient myths are merely stories to explain what science could not explain at the time it was written. As Michael Shermer (a very smart non-militant atheist by the way) said, myths are about the human struggle to deal with the great passages of time and life—birth, death, marriage, the transitions from childhood to adulthood to old age. They meet a need in the psychological or spiritual nature of humans.
I’m having a discussion with @Qingu about Karen Armstrong’s view on myths in one of the other threads. There seems to be some academic disagreement about what myths really are. I find Armstrong’s view quite convincing and I’d like to quote from her book / book reviews:
“Armstrong takes a historical approach to myth, tracing its evolution through a series of periods, from the Paleolithic to the postmyth Great Western Transformation. Each period developed myths reflecting its major concerns: images of hunting and the huntress dominated the myths of the Paleolithic, while the myths of Persephone and Demeter, Isis and Osiris developed in the agricultural Neolithic period. By the Axial Age (200 B.C. through A.D. 1500), myths became internalized, so that they no longer needed to be acted out. Reason, says Armstrong, largely supplanted myth in the Post-Axial Period, which she sees as a source of cultural and spiritual impoverishment.”
“A Short History of Myth is an essay on what role myths (and ultimately religion and spirituality) play in human life and why they remain important. Myths provide a means to connect our finite lives, bonded by our inescapably mortal condition and the fear that inevitably accompanies the knowledge of our ultimate fate, with the infinite beyond us, a connection that we feel in moments of transcendence where we literally lose our individual selves and communion with something greater than ourselves… be that God, the universe, our antecedents or heroic examples. Myth in short gives our lives meaning and significance in an otherwise frightening and indifferent world. Myths are not to be taken literally, because to do so would take the sacred out of the realm of the sacred and make it profane. Myths inhabit the world of the sacred because they are meant to exist beyond the world of profane explanation.
What Armstrong does very well is to explain how advances in the material and economic condition of human civilization throughout history and prehistory interacted with this basic human need to transcend his immediate condition to create various epochs of myth. She goes beyond myth to explain the competitors to myth, be it ritual without mythology (i.e., Confucianism) or logos (i.e., Greek rationalism) and how they had their roots in myth and why they are linked still.”
Hope you find this helpful.