Unless you can make it literally disappear, there’s always gonna be some hint lift, and disposing of a body can probably get pretty complicated.
Forensics and the authoritative figures are very good at deducing and finding a lead from merely one small charred bone fragment, for example. Unless I watch too much CSI Miami.
I’d say, in order to get away with murder, what’s important is who you kill, rather than how you dispose of their body after. I mean nobody is really going to look into the death of some poor homeless bastard as much as they might on some rich dude who owns a condom company.
But yeah that’s not the point but I wanted to say it because it leads me to this; if I could, I would probably submerge it into fresh cement so it dries over it. But that’s pretty complicated as you would have to make sure that nobody looks at said chunk of concrete twice. You’d have to get lucky and conveniently find drying concrete, and then have enough time, skill and some bit of luck to put the body in there and revert the process to what it was like before you got there.
Although it may happen, I hardly see some murder carefully work fresh cement on some construction site at three in the morn…(If they did though, by the time the body would be found, you’d probably be long passed away by then anyways.)
So, my point is, if any literal methods of disappearance are unavailable to me, which would prolly be the case unless this was a murder I was planning for months, I’d choose a method of destruction which would make it extremely hard for forensics to determine much of anything from.
(Besides knowing who the victim was, and that more based on them being on missing persons for months rather than what they find about the corpse.)
My first thought was to tie a weight to it and plunge it in the river. However, eventually some appendages may detach themselves with the rotting process, and one floating arm, head or leg or whatever is a very decent path for detectives and forensic teams. Of course, you could put the body in a bag, like a big plastic bag, a bodybag, anything solid enough to withstand the ravages of water for years.
The problem with that is, if they have any idea where the body might be, and do a search and actually find it, there will be plenty of hints to trace, such as methods of murder and all. So we have to opt for a quicker and more efficient means of destruction, unless you’re totally sure nobody’s ever gonna look where you stash it.
So my trick is to either set the body ablaze, gather the charred bits and remains and huck em in the winds over a lake, or, dismember the person into as many pieces as possible. Then cut those pieces into even smaller ones. Ever seen Fantasia? You get the point right. Cut it up, crush it, grind it whatever. THEN huck alla that into a river. (Or any body of water with strong current.Make sure to thoroughly clean the location in which you prepared the body, too. Don’t leave blood stains, skin or bones or anything. It has to be impeccable. Hell just set the place on fire afterward if you must, although that in itself might be quite suspicious.)
This way, all the small pieces will stray away from one another very quickly, and the water and current will have no problem to “erode” or ruin such small pieces even more. It might serve as a food source for fish and other river critters.
It should be next to impossible to ever retrieve anything about this poor corpse, and by the time someone did, there’s really nothing they could tell about it aside from the amount of time it’s been in the water and what it has done to it. So, harder to trace it back to the murderer.
I’m thinking about bone pieces though, those themselves might very well betray the whole plan.
So I’m just posting alla dat as I type, wasn’t meant to be that long, but it remains hypothetical.
And I don’t think I need to state this, if only because if any actual forensics or representative of the law read this, they would probably laugh on how little I actually know of such issues, methods and reasoning.
Right?