@john65pennington You suggest that buses be equipped with seat belts if they are going to travel the interstates. Why are seat belts any more imperative on the interstate than they are otherwise? Granted, the bus moves faster on the interstate, but it moves more than fast enough for a lack of seat belts to be dangerous on other roads, too.
In reference to your comment about seat belts preventing fights, I disagree. If two children want to fight, they will unbuckle and go at it. If a bully want’s to beat someone up, he/she will unbuckle, and the victim will be stuck in the seat because he/she may not have time to unbuckle before being attacked.
I think the reason a lot of buses don’t use seat belts is so all the children can get off the bus quickly in the event of an emergency. Since the children would likely panic, they would find it very difficult to undo their seat belts, and thus could be dangerously stuck on the bus if they were wearing them.
In answer to your original question, I do not believe buses should be banned from the interstate. Unless I was lied to in driver’s ed, or unless things have changed in the last seven years, there are far fewer accidents on the interstate than there are on other roads. If I recall correctly, most accidents happen near intersections. If bus drivers are taking back roads, they will incounter many, many intersections, and have that many more opportunities for an accident.
Also, why does the fact that some bus drivers speed on the interstate imply that buses should be banned from it? Any bus driver that speeds on an interstate will also speed on every other road. A dangerous driver is a dangerous driver, regardless of where he/she is driving. If anything, there should be “How am I driving?” phone numbers on buses, and the public should be encouraged to report problems. The way I see it, banning buses from the interstate will accomplish nothing.