I agree completely, and here’s how I’d fix it:
Step one: Reinstate the REAL filibuster. The filibuster used to require that the opposition party would actually have to basically shut down the government by standing up in the Senate and talking for hours, if not days on end…it was really fighting for what you believed if you filibustered. In the 70s, they decided to make a gentleman’s agreement that you would just have to say you were going to filibuster and they would table discussion unless they could get 60 votes. Before this happened we had 4 or 5 filibusters a year, now it’s nearly 140 and has been rising exponentially. Parties don’t have to try to come to agreement on anything anymore, the party in power can push through whatever it wants and the minority power can play obstructionism. If we made Senators actually stand up for what they believe and really filibuster if they are that opposed to something, they would only do it if they were really, legitimately, sincerely opposed to something with every fiber of their being…now it’s a convenience issue, a tactic.
Step two: completely reform the electoral process for all Federal offices, including the institution of completely publicly financed campaigns, truth in advertisement laws pertaining to campaign ads, completely banning 3rd party campaign ads. Advertisements would have to be factual and informative and would have to focus on what the candidate believes and intends to do, not on the personality of an opposition candidate. A certain number of political parties, let’s say the 5 parties which receive the largest number of votes in an early nationwide primary, would be allowed to field candidates and all 5 candidates would get equal exposure on public airwaves. The general election would be moved under the supervision of the Federal government, not 50 state governments plus DC, and the electoral college would be replaced by popular vote, with IRV for close races. Everyone 18 or over with a Social Security number would be allowed to vote, no registration laws that differ from state to state. And keep the polls open 24/7 for one week.
Step three: institute laws to ensure journalistic integrity in our news reports. Today’s news is about making money, not about getting the real story, true investigative journalism is expensive and usually ruffles the wrong feathers. Perhaps news needs to be publicly financed as an essential part of Democracy (an informed electorate) and journalists need to be held to a standard of objective truth, not editorial opinion mongering.
I think if we did all this, we’d have an informed public where far more people had a reason to vote, the majority of points of view would have at least one voice running for office, and everyone would have time to get their vote in, people would know the facts about the candidates’ positions and there would be no fear mongering…people would vote FOR candidates, not AGAINST them, and when our leaders were elected, they would serve in an environment where many, not just two points of view were to be considered, and they would HAVE to honestly debate and consider each others’ ideas because no one majority party could just push through its agenda and no one minority party could obstruct progress. They’d have to learn to play nice, and we’d have a better government.