@wundayatta: thank you for asking.
Are you talking about thinking of these things as medical conditions instead of mental conditions?
short answer: in many cases, yes.
longer answer: the way that you phrased the question shows how the concept influences thinking. society has certain core assumptions. when, in a postmodern culture (versus, say, a more religious one) you violate these assumptions, your actions get categorized as “mental illness”, all together, though of course, they have a “legitimate: neurological condition i.e. Asperger’s, Alzheimer’s or epilepsy.
people with these conditions would generally find themselves offended if called “mentally ill”. and yet supposedly the term has only an objective scientific meaning and carries no value judgement, right?
Are you saying that the forms of behavior that the “mentally ill” exhibit should not be considered a symptom of an illness?
short answer: yes.
longer answer: sure. that doesn’t contradict my first answer.
Are you denying that there is any relationship between certain alleles and the subsequent brain chemistry that is correlated with the display of certain patterns of behavior?
no, I wouldn’t deny it. I do think that environmental factors do play a part and so does the actions of the person. by actions, I include their thinking, of course. most people think unconsciously. they don’t think of their mind as a part of themselves that they can train, shape and develop.
I would want to live in a world where kids grow up with formal lessons in emotional intelligence that way that like they know reading and math, and carry it worth with them. in our world, kids do know this to a limited degree, though, they don’t have it impressed on them enough.