Before one can be a police officer there are a battery of tests they have to take, even map reading abilities. One of those is a psychological profile. Believe it or not, a candidate cannot be an out-of-the-box thinker, or even an independent thinker. THey MUST be moldable (pardon the generalized term). For instance, one of the multiple choice test questions asks something along the lines of: If a fellow officer did something illegal what would be the best course of action?
Two thoughts on that question. First of all, they didn’t say WHAT it was the officer in this scenario did. DId he/she run a stop sign? Or did they attend a hot tub party with hookers and lines of coke? There are varying degrees of “illegal”. If it was the former, then naturally, you’d think that this could be handled without having the officer written up or involving IA. What kind of schmuck would turn in a fellow officer for such a minor infraction?
But it is a fact that the test has multiple choice because it is a filtering device. They aren’t looking for a person who thinks confronting the officer yourself is a valid choice (no matter how small the infraction). What they want is a person who will immediately report the offense to a superior the very first chance they get, even if it means calling a superior on different shift than the one you work, if you were off duty at the time you discovered the indescretion.
I know this didn’t answer your question head on, but it DOES give an insight that cannot easily be found online. You won’t find online the specifics you’re looking for, for good reason. It would defeat the purpose of the psych tests.
Here ia a brilliant example that rocked our community about 10 years ago:
There was a police officer here who was absolutely, 100%, completely COP. No matter where he was or what he was doing, he was, first and foremost, a cop.
He was asked by a fellow officer for help moving into a new home. At some point during the move, Mr. Cop noticed a tiny baggie of what appeared to be cocaine sitting on the dresser in his friend’s/fellow officer’s bedroom. Mr. Cop was totally shocked! He questioned his friend/fellow officer, and indeed, cocaine was the substance in the tiny baggy.
Mr. Cop finished helping with the moving, and wrestled all night long that night with how to handle it, KNOWING what had to be done. He was not looking forward to it. THe next morning, he requested an audience with his captain and told what happened, which was the right thing to do, right?
WRONG. He was fired the next day because he didn’t report it IMMEDIATELY, even though he was off duty when it happened. He chose to sleep on it (so to speak. He didn’t actually get any sleep at all). This is an example of that test and a true life example to go along with it, of the types of thinking that those psych tests are designed to weed out. I hope this helps you in some way.