@the100thmonkey You need to check a few facts as well. Just because you decide to post your works under a creative commons license does not mean everyone would. At the point of my post, the asker had not specified that it was for a school assignment, but only that it was for a short film.
As far as ‘theft’ versus ‘copying’, the massive number of lawsuits the recording industry is putting out over P2P ‘sharing’ says you are wrong. When it comes to digital media, the difference is more subtle. If you own the original works, either by creativity or by purchase, you may copy it for your own use. If you do not own the original then for you to copy it is, in fact, theft. If you wish to nitpick it is copyright infringement. copyright Infringement .
If you care to debate this issue with me further, I would be happy to. I do not recall calling you, specifically, a thief. I said, if you check, if you use a work without the artist’s permission, you are a petty thief. At the point I said that, I again point out, the asker had not said it was for school. The sticky point, even with that, is that the asker is not a teacher, but is using it for classwork.
According to the fair use act: * the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes—uses in nonprofit educational institutions are more likely to be fair use than works used for commercial purposes, but not all educational uses are fair use.
* the nature of the copyrighted work—reproducing a factual work is more likely to be fair use than a creative work such as a musical composition
You are upset because you feel I called you a thief, yet you continue to say I spout nonsense, without checking how much of what I say is true. I think you have no room to cry foul.