Consider an example. Suppose you have a topic such as this: “Analyze the protagonist’s relationship to authority figures in Little Red Riding Hood.” You might think about this and form the opinion that LRR is submissive to authority figures only as long as they tell her to do what she wants to do anyway.
Your outline is simple:
Introduction
Point 1: argument and evidence from text
Point 2: argument and evidence from text
Point 3: argument and evidence from text
(You might want to cover more than three points, but three good ones are enough for most purposes.)
Conclusion
You would write an introduction setting forth your view or opinion on the topic—the opinion you formed as you were thinking about it. In this case you’d also have to define what you mean by authority figures; you might say they’re anyone who is older and bigger than LRR.
You’d then discuss the first encounter with an authority figure—the mother—and explain how the text shows LRR’s obedience to her mother when she agrees to carry the basket to her grandmother. This is point 1. You might note the mother’s warnings, which suggest that she knows LRR might be tempted to stray.
Next you’d talk about the second encounter, when LRR meets the wolf, and point to evidence in the text that shows how readily the girl agrees to depart from the path and ignore her mother’s instructions now that someone else is influencing her. This is point 2.
Third, you’d explain what happens when the girl meets the wolf posing as the grandmother. This time she is frightened because she senses something amiss with the authority figure—grandmother does not look as expected—and she resists. This is point 3.
Then you’d draw a conclusion that is not the same as the introduction. The conclusion adds up the points you’ve made and goes beyond them, such as to arrive at a summation saying that LRR is a foolish, susceptible youngster who deserves to be eaten up and who needs yet another authority figure, the woodsman, to rescue her.
Now you have an essay.
Notice three things here, please:
— You have to begin by doing the reading.
— Then you have to form an opinion or arrive at some insight about it relative to the prompt or essay topic. This is indispensable. If you don’t have a thought, you can’t write about it. Try to have a thought on a manageable scale and not tackle something so big that people write Ph.D. dissertations about it.
— The structure itself is simple and formulaic. you state your position, you make each point citing evidence from the text, and you draw your conclusion.
You can write a thousand successful essays without ever varying from that formula. I wrote my first such in about 1961 and my most recent only two weeks ago, and it hasn’t failed me yet.