@RealEyesRealizeRealLies “But in these cases, the so called plan is built at the same time the phenomenon is assembled. That is not a plan, and it is certainly not a code that maps probability space A to B in advance.”
Feedback loops don’t necessarily have plans. However, the final outcome is dependent on initial conditions. When you feedback a final outcome into the initial conditions you can get a system that behaves very differently from randomness.
Take your TV static example. If I took the static on a TV screen and mapped each pixel to a feedback loop that introduces the pixels color (either black or white) back into the initial state then the likely result is to get an entirely white TV screen over the course of time. This is not information, but it certainly is not random. Now if some outside constraint altered the inputs then you might start to get things that appear non-random and symbolic. In the case of the TV screen I might apply a constraint that favors when the pixels form a checkerboard pattern.
Genetics seems to have started from similar humble beginnings. Certain chemical reactions occurred that were subject to constraints by natural selection and information theory. These constraints and the subsequent feedback from their ability to meet these constraints caused alterations to the initial conditions (the original chemical and its reactions).
The plan isn’t really a plan. Its the chemical reaction that creates an organism that abides by the constraints imposed on it by natural selection.
If there was really a plan, why doesn’t it stop where it is. A plan has ends and some means to get there. DNA simply reproduces, there is no ultimate goal of it and no end in sight. Organisms are a consequence of DNA reproducing and the constraints that are applied to its reproduction. Yes, we can identify current species by genetic markers. This is because the organisms are a direct result of the DNA reproducing within current constraints. If those constraints change, the DNA and thus organism change.
If DNA is a code why does it change with changing constraints (as in evolution)? Certainly no sentient author adds new code to the database of DNA symbolism before a new species emerges, yet when new species occur, new code is found. New information must occur within DNA to explain new features not found in other organisms. There was no sentient author for these new features and thus no plan for what the new “code” should do. This must mean that natural selection authors code and that it does not have a plan. Without natural selection new genetic code would not develop so don’t just say that it’s “front-loaded” to alter itself as it pleases. Natural selection is the causal driver of new genetic code.
“This is not code, and there is no meaning until a mind observes and describes it.”
You are right that no meaning exists until minds observe it. However, this doesn’t change that the initial conditions causally determine the outcomes. You seem again to be assuming that meaning must exist for for representation to occur. I’ve shown that feedback allows representation without sentient observance and that plans don’t exist for new features in new species.
“And it doesn’t take into account Free Will.”
Why should it, if what you call free will is a consequence of previous states of matter? What you call free will I have identified as a control loop feedback mechanism. Feedback systems are causal depending only on their initial orientation and inputs they receive.
“If the Singularity pre-determined the earth to exist 13.8 billion years ago, and therefor determined the leaves to fall in my yard… how did it pre-destine my free will to rake them up and burn them into ash?”
You are assuming that free will exists. I purport it does not. The initial conditions of the universe predestined your actions because your actions are a consequence of your brain’s neuronal pathways. Your neuronal pathways are a consequence of your interaction with the outside world and genetics. The outside world and genetics (I purport) are consequences of the initial conditions of the universe. Even if genetics were introduced by an intelligent being, that intelligent being did not create special rules for information that allow it to be acausal. Information is causal because it exists as states of matter. Information transfer, encoding, decoding, and storage must all be performed with physical entities undergoing physical state changes.
I totally did not see myself writing this much in response….sorry for the essay again.