The problem with throwing out general accusations without naming names is that a lot more people think you are talking about them. They then assume they are not liked because of this blanket accusation. That makes them feel unwelcome. It makes them feel like there are two categories of people at fluther. It creates an unfriendly atmosphere.
I’m not going to tell anyone not to say anything. I won’t tell you not to talk about the secret fluther cabal that is working towards world domination, and will bring a select few, politically correct jellies with them. I’m not going to tell anyone not to talk about the fluther bordello that is secretly enslaving new female jellies and locking them to bedposts so that the 20K plus male jellies can spout bad poetry at them. I’m not going to tell you not to talk about the hidden clique system that passes out secret messages via the award system that only old jellies know how to understand.
I won’t tell you not to say any of that because I think you should be free to make an ass of yourself if you want, or to worry about fluther culture and be misguided about what is going on.
All I ask are two things that are kind of the same thing. First, I ask that people try to be aware of the sensitivities of others, and when making mass accusations, to be transparent about what you are talking about. Use examples. Name names.
Second, I ask that the mods and the bendrews of this place make it more transparent what they are working on and what their concerns are. Mods see “problems,” and presumably, they have more data, but I am not sure they are the best people to interpret that data or to develop policy changes based on their interpretations. We should be told what issues concern them and why. It should be done in a way that few people are wondering if they are the person being discussed.
In the absence of transparency, no one knows who is talking about what behind closed doors. They don’t know who will be banned next. An atmosphere of fear can develop, as everyone wonder who will be caught next in the witch hunt and what they have to do to avoid the pogrom.
That’s what I ask. I don’t expect anyone in management will take what I say into consideration. In that, I am as lowly as the jelly who signed up ten seconds ago. No one has ever asked my opinion about any of these issues and I am in the dark just as much as anyone else. I, too, have to wonder if @dpworkin puts my questions in the aggressive stupidity category.
Do we want fluther turned into a soviet style, backstabbing society? I hope not. However, to me, it looks like that’s where we’re headed.
I’m sure everyone in power will think I’m overreacting and I don’t know shit, so there’s no point in paying attention to me. If I had a dollar for every time I’ve been told I’m overreacting here, I’d have…... well, maybe twenty dollars. I’ll probably earn a few more with this comment.
But it really, really concerns me when people do not take into account the feelings of everyone in the community, and ignore the possibility that anyone may come here “stupid” and grow and become very important jellies (VIJ?) over time. When we complain about the quality of questions, we are writing off all of these potential contributors. Most teens do end up being twenty and thirty-somethings after a while.
It really concerns me when there is any ranking going on, even covert ranking. Especially covert ranking. Because that can lead to a perception of much more ranking going on than there is.
We should all be for each other, the smartest and stupidest of us, because these things change, and if we push someone out, we may be pushing out the next Sojourner Truth or Barack Obama, who surely both had moments of idiocy in their youths. Anything where we compare one person or one group to another is going to make someone feel bad, and cause us loss.
Please, be aware of this, and think twice before making blanket statements about various classes of jellies (new vs veteran, young vs old, who has the best answer, who has the best question)—remember the people who are left out will probably feel bad. That does not create an atmosphere conducive to openness.