There’s no way you’d absorb more info watching TV unless you were watching CSPAN or PBS. I realize you prefer to absorb your information passively, but to do so, you’d have only watch intelligent channels.
(CNN,Fox, MSNBC, and ABC/NBC/CBS and local news don’t count as “information”).
The TV has a much higher percentage of propagandized and spoonfed information, over the newspapers and internet.
Only the internet has a nonstop stream of truth, amongst everything else it has, which is everything.
What if you just surfed TED lectures on the internet? Then you’d be able to sit passively like you do with the TV, but you will get some information that is salt of the earth compared to the excrement that is television.
As for the background of your question, you make a good point that it is stupid of your school to make someone like you read, read, and read… when for the price of those textbooks, they could have you just learn off of interactive CD-ROMS containing lots of videos.
A well-made documentary about the American Revolution will probably teach you a lot more about that Revolution, than forcing you to memorize names, dates, and facts.
It is stupid to make you do that, when better methods exist. Cheaper methods, too.