@DominicX
That’s a real can of worms you’re opening up there. It really deserves explaining. I don’t know what your knowledge base of the bible is to make such a global claim about it. I can only share what I have learned about it after reading five different versions and studying it for the past 35 years or more.
First off, please understand that my own personal interpretations of the bible are hardly similar to the popular understandings shared by both Christians and Atheists alike. As I’ve said before, the bible has been misread, misrepresented, and religion is responsible for that.
There are so many misconceptions about the bible that I hardly know where to begin. But keeping this as short as possible, let me point out a few common truancy’s.
When you say, “Bible is an authority for deontological ethics and it’s condemnation of homosexuality was meant to be timeless…”, that’s a really mixed bag.
Old Testament…
People have somehow gotten the impression that the Law of Moses is the same thing as the Law of God. They are not the same. But that is one of the most common sources of conflated confusions that prevent any truth from being discussed.
The Law of God is nothing more than the Ten Commandments. They are meant for governing the heart of man. The Law of Moses is meant for governing the nation of Israel. The Ten Commandments was the only Law that was supposedly written by the finger of God upon the stone tablets. There is nothing specifically against homosexuality in the Ten Commandments whatsoever. This Law of God was not from the mouth of Moses. It was directly from God almighty.
The Law of Moses was specifically crafted to keep the nation of Israel pure unto itself and safe from external threats. Homosexuality was given no more attention than Adultery, Fornication, Rape, Incest, Bestiality, Drunkenness, Spying, Thievery… Non of which could be tolerated for that nation and in that time. Our modern lives are completely incapable of comprehending human existence in that era of violence, where son would kill father to be king, and the loose tongue of a drunkard son could bring about war. Moses wanted to keep Israel pure. The Law of Moses was designed to do just that. Whether it came from God or not is a matter of debate. But if indeed it did, it cannot be denied that it would serve its intended purpose for that early nation, surrounded by predatory kingdoms. It was a vile time to be alive.
New Testament…
Jesus never once spoke out against Homosexuality. Again, his concern was for the sin of the heart… lying, cheating, adultery, greed, deception, pride, arrogance. Whenever the pharisees challenged him with a perceived sin of the flesh, he offered only forgiveness.
As well, sorry to ruin the Christian’s day, but Christ never claimed to be God nor the Son of God. He only referred to himself in two ways. Many times, as “I, the Son of Man”, and “I am the way, the truth, and the life”.
When Christ claimed to fulfill the Law, he was not speaking of the Law of Moses. He was speaking of the Law of God… The Ten Commandments.
“Think not that I have come to abolish the law and the prophets; I have come not to abolish them but to fulfil them. For truly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the law until all is accomplished. Whoever then relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but he who does them and teaches them shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I tell you, unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.”
(Matthew 5:17–20)
There are many more scriptures to confirm that Jesus was fulfilling the Law of God, and not the Law of Moses.
So Dominic, when you claim the fact that the bible is an “authority for deontological ethics”, that may be so for The Ten Commandments and the teachings of Jesus, but there is no reason to include the Law of Moses as an authority for anything other than the Jews of that time, in that region, facing the challenges that we could never hope to associate with.
I want to write so much more on this. It’s quite involved, but hopefully you get the idea where I’m coming from.