Would this work for a wireless print network?
Asked by
Gruz06 (
811)
June 6th, 2010
Observing members:
0
Composing members:
0
4 Answers
It’s cheap enough to give ‘er a go, except you would need to get an adapter to plug it into the printer. I would assign it a static IP too. I think I’ll pick up a couple few of these just to have in my toolbag.
Sound theory, but I am a little hesitant on that particular one though.
“Full-speed (12Mbps) USB device” – Last I checked, that was USB 1.1 yet it claims to be USB 2.0 which is 480Mbps, or 40 times faster. Sounds like an ad written by either a liar or an idiot, neither of whom I would trust.
I take a bit of time to transmit a job to my printer that is hooked to my desktop from my laptop since I have to use the 100Mbps LAN connection between my desktop and router instead of just printing it off the desktop machine which has a 480 Mbps USB 2.0 conection to the printer so I cannot imagine doing it slower!
It depends on where you want to stick the adapter.
1. If you want to attach it to the printer, it will not work, as USB devices require a host controller to interpret the data they send. AFAIK, printers (even fancy-dan ones that print over ethernet/wireless) present themselves as clients, not servers.
2. If you want to attach it to a computer, it might work, as the printer (presumably attached via RJ45 at the other end) will be agnostic about the communication protocol that the server is using. However, I don’t think this is what you have in mind.
Answer this question
This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.