@ChazMaz DIctionary definition of Hinky: Suspicious. And you’re the guy that said “Inappropriate has to have cause.” So does suspicion. You’re implying the problem of cheating without saying so. Don’t pretend you’re thinking anything different from us.
Honestly, not if the other is spending all their time with a partner substute.
Now, this might be my definition, but to me best friend + sex + desire to keep the partner in your life = relationship.
And even assuming she’s a surrogate, what’s wrong with that? If anything, it’s disrespectful towards the surrogate, rather than her.
If he was bisexual, the question would me misrepresentative.
What i’m saying is that the way you put it, specifying he’s spending time with another woman, rather than with anybody else, it seems that the problem lies within the fact that the friend’s a woman. Thus the question: If the question happend to concern a bisexual forming a strong bond with someone of a sex different from his partner’s would it still be a problem? -> Would a bisexual have to be a hermit when away from his present partner in order to avoid possible attraction to anybody else?
Not my end, your end. No preconception here. How old are you?
You’re the one who defined the behaviour to be “hinky”, unless you meant some obscure meaning of the word hinky means suspicious. Moving on.
Ah, now I get it. This is personal. There is that issue thing coming to the surface.
Keep your two cents to yourself, if i want your opinion on why i’m debating i’ll ask you for it.
I made a counterexample, regarding the correlation between jealousy and respect. I was jealous at the beginning, but then i realized that being jealous implies i don’t trust her and forced myself to get over it. That’s all.
By the way, if you want to play shrink, i could say all sorts of interesting things about you denying the fact you’ve been talking about cheating the whole time, while saying he should be dating this other person, only because he’s spending time with her when he can’t spend it with his present girlfriend; as if wanting to spend time with someone automatically led to romantic feelings and a relationship (with everything it entails). If that was the case i’d have a harem by now.
I think we should have a picnic on the middle of the highway. No reason to believe a truck will run us over, that being the worse case scenario.
What a bullshit simile. This simile would work if the one suggesting that had the power to deviate trucks with his mind. Again, you’re treating cheating as a virtual inevitability, as something that will surely happen given enough time, which is a bias on your part that i don’t happen to share. If that was the case, again, i’d have Hugh Hefner’s sex life.
Apparently you are just on a roll, and you have plenty to learn about life…
You can spare the patronising bullshit, thank you very much. I happen to value an argument because of its own merits and not because the one who is suggesting it is older than i am. You could be methuselah and still be wrong.
I perfectly know that not everybody is trustworthy and that in many, let’s even say most, cases this situation would lead to cheating. It’s still unfair on the boyfriend to assume he’s a cheating prick without any actual proof, expecially considering he seems to be making at least SOME effort to compromise. This nonwithstanding any opinion.
You don’t condemn people on a potential crime, if that was the case we’d have to put in jail every person who buys a weapon, because they’ll use it to rob someone, rather than for self defense.