@Zaku What concerned me is that it is all well and good to say there is an abundance of housing. Let’s assume that is true, although I don’t believe it is.
Right now, there are millions of people without homes. There are even more who occupy homes. These homes are of many different types of quality.
My question is practical. How do you propose to use the current housing stock to house all the people? If you can’t provide a mechanism to do this, then there isn’t enough housing and your assertion is untrue.
I assumed you would have some redistribution mechanism such as those often used in totalitarian regimes that called themselves communist (soviets and maoists). I don’t happen to think they actually were communist, but I used that term because that’s how most people, I believe, think of communism.
But perhaps you don’t have a communist redistribution of the wealth (housing) system in mind. Perhaps you have some other mechanism. However, if you are unwilling to get practical, then your assertions are meaningless.
Now you also speak of an expanding population. I don’t believe I was talking about that. I was talking about an expanding economy, which is a quite different thing. I believe we can expand the economy while using even fewer resources. All it takes is increased efficiency or productivity. Humans have been continuously improving productivity for a long time.
The population problem is a different issue, and unrelated to this question, I believe. Again, though, if it is a problem, what is your solution? Your doable solution?
Personally, I believe we will only be able to affect population growth very marginally. It will do what it will do. It’s out of our control in the same way the tides are out of our control. We can put in a few sea gates to generate electricity, but that won’t affect the tides much at all.
However, I do not believe population will expand indefinitely. From the demographic projections I’ve seen, the population will top out at 10 or 12 billion and then proceed to fall. A falling population is a very serious problem for humans (although maybe not for other species).
Demographic projections are not terribly reliable, so who knows what will really happen. All we can do is hope for the best and plan for the worst.
Now you also mention traditional cultures that have different principles that you believe let humans live in balance. Do you have examples of these cultures? Have you studied the actual history of these cultures instead of listening merely to their myths? Have you drawn any conclusions about the viability of cultures that do not expand economically?