@Dr_Lawrence – I say a good question will always offend someone.
To the point that I am “searching for the best kind of food to offend vegans,” nothing could be further from the truth. My pondering did not begin with Vegans, but with the idea of head cheese, something I personally find repulsive and can’t even imagine why anyone would partake of something so hideous and vile. My mind simply clicked…head cheese…made out of heads…part of a head is a face…vegans don’t eat anything with a face…this must be the worst thing a vegan can imagine.
Which also begins to answer @Simone_De_Beauvoir‘s query as to what the point of this is. The purpose of the question is multi-faceted-
1) To determine if anyone else finds this to be an interesting concept…that some will eat nothing with a face, while others literally eat faces.
2) To determine if anyone who does not eat anything with a face is doubly (or some other factor) horrified by eating faces vs. eating other parts of animals with faces.
3) To present a rather open ended question in the social category meant to go wherever the discussion might go…in other words, if someone were to present me with an idea like this, my first thought might be to try to find other similar ironies, while others might take the question seriously and attempt to answer it, while yet others may misconstrue the intent or read something into it, which may in turn reveal something intriguing about the person.
4) Mostly to have fun, engage in dialogue, be challenged, have thought provked and to do what I always do on Fluther which is to interject parts of the inner workings of my own mind and personality into the collective to make it a more enjoyable venue overall.
I made the rape analogy above. To me, objecting to a question of this manner because it is tantamount to trying to find a way to offend or annoy would be like objecting to asking a rape victim a legitimate question about rape and/or her experience, perceptions, etc. The concept and act of rape will still exist, and for personal reasons may become a topic one would rather NOT discuss, but I am not a believer in unnecessarily walking on eggshells. I would not avoid discussing race with a person of a different race than my own. I would not avoid discussing sexual orientation with a person of a different sexual orientation than my own. I would not avoid discussing religion with a person of a different belief system than my own. I would not (and did not) avoid discussing dietary choices with people who have different dietary restrictions than my own. And to avoid asking questions about things you know little to nothing about of the people who know the most about those topics and are therefore best suited to answer those those questions out of a worry that my lack of knowledge and understanding of a topic might cause me to phrase my inquiry in a way to which the person might take offense is in my view ludicrous.
Botton line, I don’t apologize for asking questions. My philosophy is if you don’t want to answer the question, don’t answer the question. That’s why we have a collective, and that’s why we have a social area to ask questions within the collective.