@DarlingRhadamanthus I wasn’t commenting at all on the difference between academic institutions in the UK and USA, as you rightly said, I have no experience of university education in the States, and thus deliberately didn’t make any comment on the situation in the USA. Please don’t get me wrong, I don’t in any way think you were being insulting about universities in the UK (I am guessing you wouldn’t have gone to one if you didn’t think positively of it!), but I was just concerned that based on my experience, you seemed to be really misrepresenting to the person who asked the question what universities in the UK are, on the whole, actually like. Of course, if this is your experience then it’s not wrong at all to share it, and I think your comparisons can be really helpful and valuable to someone wanting to appreciate cultural differences, but as you reminded me in your post, I think you should also remember that your experience is just one experience, and other classes, courses and departments may be very different indeed. You seem to be totally aware of that in your most recent post, but I really didn’t get that impression in your original response to the question, which is really why I said something. I just didn’t really think it was right to generalise and say that British universities are places where you are just “given a stack of books and told to “read” and you are tested on this once and then have a final exam” based on what happened to you in “three or four classes”. Please don’t think I am disagreeing with you that UK universities may be harder, or require more autonomy than American institutions (I have absolutely no reason not to trust what you say in that respect), but even without your cross-cultural knowledge, I think I can still disagree with your characterisation of things in the UK, even with my total ignorance of the American system.
Actually, one of the universities that you are referring to is one I am, personally, highly familiar with, and I would still disagree with your characterisation, despite this. Undoubtedly, Oxbridge is more of a challenging academic environment, and of course, there will always be occasional lecturers and individual modules that may be closer to what you describe, but I really don’t think this is by any means the norm. I was born in Cambridge and spent the first 21 years of my life living there, my dad has been a professor there for the past three decades, and I used to be employed there in one of the academic schools. In terms of the broader perspective that my opinion is based on, I have personally studied at York and Sheffield, and am currently at Exeter doing a PhD and working as a graduate teaching assistant. Obviously, having lived in this country all my life, I have close friends and family that went to even more different places (e.g., Leeds, Nottingham, Manchester, Leicester, London, Glasgow, Surrey, just to name a few!), so with all due respect, and without trying at all to dispute your experience (obviously it is what happened to you personally), I think my disagreement with your perspective is based on a variety of different experiences of British universities of varying prestige. With this in mind, whilst undoubtedly respecting the differences that exist, I think I have plenty of experience on which to base my opinion that the broad characterisation you made in your original post isn’t accurate, and something I wouldn’t consider to be a fair representation of how universities in the UK generally are. I’m not saying that it never happens, but I just don’t think that the generalisation is really true.
P.S. There are actually multiple choice questions at university in the UK! When I studied Psychology at York (some years ago, when it was second in the league tables for that subject, ahead of Oxford but behind Cambridge – so by all means, not a soft option and a very well respected course), we had several exams with multiple choice questions.