I see a lot of jellies have said GW is a fact….show them please! Experts would love to see them too!
Climate forcing agents as it is known is what has been driving the Climategate school of thought.
From Wiki….New studies on climate forcing agents not conventionally considered have, however, raised doubts as to the continued viability of the radiative forcing concept. For example, the climatic effects from light-absorbing aerosols or land-use changes do not lend themselves to quantification using the traditional radiative forcing concept. Aerosol effects on clouds are difficult to describe in terms of simple radiative forcing. These challenges have raised the question of whether the radiative forcing concept has outlived its usefulness and, if so, what new climate change metrics should be used.
That being said and as I usually do, I dig a little deeper and found a study/report/analysis on the uncertainties of this climate/radioactive forcings by the…
Committee on Radiative Forcing Effects on Climate
Climate Research Committee
Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate
Division on Earth and Life Studies
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS
and they kinda don’t think that the data surrounding this concept is really relevant given the short term actual data and the supplied proxy data isn’t all that it adds up to be…
New studies on climate forcing agents not conventionally considered have, however, raised doubts as to the continued viability of the radiative forcing concept. For example, the climatic effects from light-absorbing aerosols or land-use changes do not lend themselves to quantification using the traditional radiative forcing concept. Aerosol effects on clouds are difficult to describe in terms of simple radiative forcing. These challenges have raised the question of whether the radiative forcing concept has outlived its usefulness and, if so, what new climate change metrics should be used.
So they are looking for new ways to quantify climate data and our reliance on estimates since the 1700’s or the beginning of the industrial revolution may very well be a natural occurring temp swing as has been since the earth was created. These other forces could be orbital issues and other naturally occurring physical forces, such as volcanic or organic in nature. In a sense experts on both sides simply don’t know enough to really drive legislation in how we should or should not conduct ourselves.
Anyone really invested in either side of the equation here really should read for yourself the conclusions in this study starting on page 100 here (it’s a free read ignore the request for payment and keep hitting the page arrows) and especially look at the global emissions chart predictions on pgs 102 and 103 and see we do have a monster of an “issue” at hand and clearly steps do need to be taken but how big and how fast is still clearly unknown.
My take away is this climate issue is one of the biggest political footballs ever and to approach the subject matter first and foremost as such. Follow the money!!!