Why do people feel the need to miss out the "Pod" in iPod Touch?

Thank you bluemukaki i noticed the large amount of users that called it the “itouch” and I completely agree.

iThink it’s lTyping. gQuestion!

(I think it’s less Typing. Great question!)

In the blog world, it picked up the name iTouch since it is essentially an iPhone sans features. Not only that, but it is shorter and catchier – and the masses love catchy. Pod is so old-school and has a connotation of being “fat”. And yeah, I call my Nano a Nano, and Shuffle – well – a Shuffle.

This isn’t a justification for the name, just a thought.

It’s like people calling the Apple store the iPod store.

I agree with you bluemukaki…my best guess is that culturally, we’re in such a rush that we truncate for efficiency and/or convenience. I loathe this same concept when it involves proper names like mine (Jonathan vs. Jon).

I’m going to take a stand for iTouch users. I call mine an iTouch, because people instantly know what I’m referring to. If I say iPod then they ask what kind, or why it looks funny etc. I think it’s a different product than the other iPod. Actually, I think it’s different enough to have it’s own name. An iPod is a music player that might be able to handle some videos (depending on the model.) The iTouch is a music player that is able to browse the internet, download music, watch movies, etc. It’s not in the same field as the other iPods and therefore should be called differently.

I call it I touch that’s what it is

iTouch is shorter than ” iPod touch ”

I’m just speculating here, but perhaps the iPod in the name iPod Touch is suggestive of a direction that the future iPod line will eventually take, so they want to retain the identity of an iPod versus a full-featured communicator (iPhone).

It just so happens that the iPod Touch is only the first (in the line) of iPods to include the internet and wifi-based features…as a mac geek, I’m willing to bet future offerings of the more diminutive models will eventually include the wifi radio, and have some sort of touch-based interactivity beyond the touch-wheel.