Welp, let’s take apart your argument piece by piece:
1. “Some vegetarians make statements about how it takes less energy to grow grain than to feed an animal, yet a look at most any third world country says this is nonsense.”
“On average, animal protein production in the U.S. requires 28 kilocalories (kcal) for every kcal of protein produced for human consumption. Beef and lamb are the most costly, in terms of fossil fuel energy input to protein output at 54:1 and 50:1, respectively. Turkey and chicken meat production are the most efficient (13:1 and 4:1, respectively). Grain production, on average, requires 3.3 kcal of fossil fuel for every kcal of protein produced. The U.S. now imports about 54 percent of its oil; by the year 2015, that import figure is expected to rise to 100 percent.” Cornell University Science News
As you can see, the argument is not about food energy but the fossil fuel energy involved with large-scale industrial agriculture.
Further, the grains that are actually used in CAFOs generally are fit for human consumption. You could have very easily argued that these animals should be switched to consuming grains that are not useful for humans (e.g., grass).
2. “If you told Inner Mongolians to grow corn instead of eating sheep, they’d starve. Their rocky ground only supports sparse tufts of grass.”
Cool, sounds like a great solution for Inner Mongolians. How does this apply to the CAFOs that supply >99% of meat to Americans…?
3. “Midwest animal feed lots are the exception in the world, not the rule, so is there really a valid ecological argument about vegetarianism?”
Yes, if the meat you would be eating comes from “midwest animal feed lots!” Environmental concerns are a component of my choice not to eat meat, because the meat I would actually be eating is not sustainably farmed.
If you want to understand the environmental argument against eating meat, I suggest you do some reading, starting with, I dunno, the wikipedia article called ‘Environmental effects of meat eating.’ Here’s the second paragraph just to get you started:
“According to a 2006 report by the Livestock, Environment And Development Initiative, the livestock industry is one of the largest contributors to environmental degradation worldwide, and modern practices of raising animals for food contributes on a “massive scale” to air and water pollution, land degradation, climate change, and loss of biodiversity. The initiative concluded that “the livestock sector emerges as one of the top two or three most significant contributors to the most serious environmental problems, at every scale from local to global.”[1] In 2006 FAO estimated that meat industry contributes 18% of all emissions of greenhouse gasses. This figure was revised in 2009 by two World Bank scientists and estimated at 51% minimum.”